Skip to content

Add CODEOWNERS#2222

Open
Dreamsorcerer wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codeowners
Open

Add CODEOWNERS#2222
Dreamsorcerer wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codeowners

Conversation

@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer commented May 22, 2026

Needs ruleset to be updated to include "Require review from Code Owners"..

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

greptile-apps Bot commented May 22, 2026

Greptile Summary

This PR introduces a .github/CODEOWNERS file to begin enforcing code-owner review requirements, with the accompanying branch ruleset update called out as a follow-up step in the PR description.

  • The file assigns @Dreamsorcerer, @leshy, and @spomichter as owners for the /.github/ directory, which protects workflow files and the CODEOWNERS file itself from being modified without their approval.
  • No catch-all (*) ownership rule is defined, so all paths outside of .github/ — including the main source tree (dimos/), docker/, scripts/, docs/, and others — are unowned. Once the ruleset is enabled, PRs touching only those paths will have no required reviewer.

Confidence Score: 3/5

Safe to merge as-is, but the code-owner protection it establishes will not cover the main source tree until a catch-all rule is added.

The CODEOWNERS file only protects .github/ itself. Every other directory in the repository — including dimos/, docker/, scripts/, and docs/ — has no assigned owner. Once the branch ruleset is enabled, PRs that don't touch .github/ will have no required reviewer, so the intended gate won't apply to the bulk of the codebase.

.github/CODEOWNERS needs a wildcard catch-all rule to cover paths outside of .github/.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
.github/CODEOWNERS Adds CODEOWNERS with owners for /.github/ only; no catch-all rule means the rest of the repository has no assigned owners.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A[PR opened] --> B{Files changed?}
    B -->|Inside /.github/| C[CODEOWNERS rule matches]
    B -->|Outside /.github/\ne.g. dimos/, docker/, scripts/| D[No matching CODEOWNERS rule]
    C --> E[Requires review from\n@Dreamsorcerer @leshy @spomichter]
    D --> F[No required code-owner reviewer\n— check skipped / vacuously passes]
    E --> G[Branch ruleset enforces approval]
    F --> H[PR can merge without\ncode-owner review]
Loading

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Add CODEOWNERS" | Re-trigger Greptile

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant