🔒 [security fix] Unvalidated URL Scheme in Webhook Target#29
Conversation
This commit adds URL validation to the `sendWebhook` function to ensure that only `http://` and `https://` schemes are allowed for webhook targets. This prevents potential misuse of other protocols allowed by the browser environment, such as `javascript:` or `file:`. Changes: - Implemented protocol validation in `utils/utils.js`. - Added localized error messages in `_locales/en/messages.json`. - Improved error handling to provide specific feedback for invalid schemes vs malformed URLs. Co-authored-by: cmuench <211294+cmuench@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
The "Unvalidated URL Scheme" vulnerability in the webhook target has been fixed.
🎯 What: Webhook URLs are now validated to ensure they use safe protocols.
⚠️ Risk: Without this validation, an attacker could potentially trigger malicious actions using schemes like
javascript:or access local files viafile:.🛡️ Solution: Added a check using the
URLconstructor to verify that the protocol is eitherhttp:orhttps:before performing the fetch operation. Localized error messages were added for better user experience.PR created automatically by Jules for task 2789224520900377017 started by @cmuench