Merged
Conversation
ibhati
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SVS_CHECK_BOUNDSlogic so that explicitly passingSVS_EXPERIMENTAL_CHECK_BOUNDSwill trump any other settings, but not explicitly passing will lead toSVS_CHECK_BOUNDSdepending onCMAKE_BUILD_TYPEDSVS_EXPERIMENTAL_CHECK_BOUNDS=OFF, but this now changes - see table below for more detailsSVS_CHECK_BOUNDS value (current behavior)

SVS_CHECK_BOUNDS value (updated behavior)
