Skip to content

Conversation

@prathmeshcc
Copy link
Collaborator

@prathmeshcc prathmeshcc commented Jan 22, 2026

Change transaction_test (spanner) naming terminology.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. label Jan 22, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @prathmeshcc, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and consistency of documentation and test comments within the Spanner client library. The changes involve updating specific terms related to transaction isolation levels and option handling, ensuring that the language used is more precise and aligns better with standard database terminology. This improves the overall readability and maintainability of the codebase for developers.

Highlights

  • Documentation Clarity: Updated terminology in google/cloud/spanner/transaction.h comments to replace 'snapshot transactions' with 'repeatable read transactions' for improved accuracy regarding the kRepeatableRead isolation level.
  • Test Comment Consistency: Revised comments in google/cloud/spanner/transaction_test.cc to use 'default options' instead of 'client default' and 'transaction options or default options' instead of 'transaction level or client level', enhancing consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request focuses on improving the clarity of comments related to transaction isolation levels. The changes in transaction.h and transaction_test.cc replace more generic or ambiguous terms with specific and accurate terminology, such as changing 'snapshot transactions' to 'repeatable read transactions'. These updates enhance code readability and maintainability. The changes are correct and beneficial, and I have no further suggestions.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.96%. Comparing base (253b689) to head (7aeea97).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15900      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.97%   92.96%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2460     2460              
  Lines      228864   228864              
==========================================
- Hits       212775   212753      -22     
- Misses      16089    16111      +22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@prathmeshcc prathmeshcc marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2026 20:52
@prathmeshcc prathmeshcc requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2026 20:52
@prathmeshcc prathmeshcc enabled auto-merge (squash) January 23, 2026 16:22
@prathmeshcc prathmeshcc merged commit b5bad6b into googleapis:main Jan 23, 2026
56 of 58 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants