-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 438
docs(spanner): update isolation level terminology in comments #15900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(spanner): update isolation level terminology in comments #15900
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @prathmeshcc, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on enhancing the clarity and consistency of documentation and test comments within the Spanner client library. The changes involve updating specific terms related to transaction isolation levels and option handling, ensuring that the language used is more precise and aligns better with standard database terminology. This improves the overall readability and maintainability of the codebase for developers. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request focuses on improving the clarity of comments related to transaction isolation levels. The changes in transaction.h and transaction_test.cc replace more generic or ambiguous terms with specific and accurate terminology, such as changing 'snapshot transactions' to 'repeatable read transactions'. These updates enhance code readability and maintainability. The changes are correct and beneficial, and I have no further suggestions.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15900 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.97% 92.96% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 2460 2460
Lines 228864 228864
==========================================
- Hits 212775 212753 -22
- Misses 16089 16111 +22 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Change transaction_test (spanner) naming terminology.