Add definitions for aviation terms and codes#53
Add definitions for aviation terms and codes#53SoTi-AF wants to merge 1 commit intoairframesio:mainfrom
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request adds six new code-description mappings (EGGX, AFR088, BALIX, 1754, M083, F360) to the Analysis section of research/B1.md, extending the explanatory content without modifying existing examples or logic. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
research/B1.md (1)
40-46: Definitions belong in the "Acronyms / Codes" section, not the "Analysis" section.The document already has a dedicated "Acronyms / Codes" section (lines 28–30) that still contains only a
...placeholder. Moving these definitions there would be consistent with the document's intended structure.Additionally, the new lines use a bare
KEY = Valueformat, while the surrounding Analysis section uses Markdown bullet lists (- ...). If these must stay in the Analysis section, they should match the existing list style; if moved to "Acronyms / Codes" they should follow whatever convention that section adopts.♻️ Suggested restructure
Move the definitions to the Acronyms / Codes section and apply consistent list formatting:
## Acronyms / Codes -... +- **EGGX** = Shanwick Oceanic FIR / OCA (ICAO FIR identifier) +- **AFR088** = Flight callsign / flight number +- **BALIX** = Oceanic Entry Point (OEP) +- **1754** = HHMM — estimated time of arrival (UTC) over the OEP +- **M083** = Mach number (0.83) +- **F360** = Flight level (36,000 ft)And remove the bare definitions from the bottom of the Analysis section.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@research/B1.md` around lines 40 - 46, Move the bare "KEY = Value" definitions (EGGX, AFR088, BALIX, 1754, M083, F360) out of the Analysis section and place them in the existing "Acronyms / Codes" section; format them there as a consistent list (e.g., bullet items) to match the document style and remove the duplicates from the Analysis section so the Analysis uses its existing Markdown list style only.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@research/B1.md`:
- Line 43: Replace the informal definition of BALIX with the standard ICAO term
by changing "BALIX = Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point" to use "Oceanic Entry Point
(OEP)" so the line reads something like "BALIX = Oceanic Entry Point (OEP)";
ensure the abbreviation OEP is included and consistent with the earlier
`<Oceanic entry waypoint>` usage in the document.
- Line 41: The EGGX description is too generic; change the value for EGGX to the
precise ICAO designation by replacing "ATC Oceanic Center" with a clear
identifier such as "Shanwick Oceanic FIR / OCA (ICAO FIR identifier)" so the
document uses the correct FIR/OCA terminology for the EGGX code.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@research/B1.md`:
- Around line 40-46: Move the bare "KEY = Value" definitions (EGGX, AFR088,
BALIX, 1754, M083, F360) out of the Analysis section and place them in the
existing "Acronyms / Codes" section; format them there as a consistent list
(e.g., bullet items) to match the document style and remove the duplicates from
the Analysis section so the Analysis uses its existing Markdown list style only.
| - Recipient authority could be the FIR code, e.g. EGGX or KZOA, or it could be a SITA(?) address, e.g. PIKCLXS | ||
| - Remarks are not required but are possible, there are examples in [Appendix B of this document](https://www.notams.faa.gov/downloads/ShanwickOceanicClx.pdf) | ||
|
|
||
| EGGX = ATC Oceanic Center |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
EGGX description is inaccurate — use the precise ICAO term.
"ATC Oceanic Center" is not the standard designation. EGGX is the FIR identifier for the Shanwick Oceanic Control Area (OCA) and Flight Information Region (FIR). This is consistent with line 38 of the document, which already identifies EGGX as a "FIR code". Recommend updating to something like: EGGX = Shanwick Oceanic FIR / OCA (ICAO FIR identifier).
✏️ Suggested fix
-EGGX = ATC Oceanic Center
+EGGX = Shanwick Oceanic FIR / OCA (ICAO FIR identifier)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@research/B1.md` at line 41, The EGGX description is too generic; change the
value for EGGX to the precise ICAO designation by replacing "ATC Oceanic Center"
with a clear identifier such as "Shanwick Oceanic FIR / OCA (ICAO FIR
identifier)" so the document uses the correct FIR/OCA terminology for the EGGX
code.
|
|
||
| EGGX = ATC Oceanic Center | ||
| AFR088 = Flight Number or Callsign | ||
| BALIX = Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BALIX definition should use the standard ICAO term "Oceanic Entry Point (OEP)".
The Oceanic Entry Point is generally a "named" waypoint, on or close to the FIR boundary where the aircraft enters an oceanic control area — standardly abbreviated OEP. The current wording "Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point" is an informal paraphrase that diverges from the OEP terminology already used in line 35 of the same document (\<Oceanic entry waypoint\>).
✏️ Suggested fix
-BALIX = Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point
+BALIX = Oceanic Entry Point (OEP)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| BALIX = Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point | |
| BALIX = Oceanic Entry Point (OEP) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@research/B1.md` at line 43, Replace the informal definition of BALIX with the
standard ICAO term by changing "BALIX = Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point" to use
"Oceanic Entry Point (OEP)" so the line reads something like "BALIX = Oceanic
Entry Point (OEP)"; ensure the abbreviation OEP is included and consistent with
the earlier `<Oceanic entry waypoint>` usage in the document.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit