Split layouts into a commons crate - #9401
3 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2030 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (10000, 4)] |
310.2 µs | 401.6 µs | -22.76% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=16384/indices=16] |
1 ms | 1.2 ms | -11.4% |
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (1000, 16)] |
64.4 µs | 72.6 µs | -11.3% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(64, 256)] |
5.1 ms | 4.4 ms | +16.53% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar[65536] |
9.4 µs | 8.3 µs | +13.67% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1.2 ms | 1 ms | +12.98% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(10000, 64, 4)] |
9.7 ms | 8.6 ms | +11.83% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/layout-split (996bb2c) with develop (93b0535)
Footnotes
-
46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩