Implement the RowFn execution backend - #9353
Performance Regression: -1.96%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 4 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1987 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_primitive_tight_loop[10000] |
410.4 µs | 491.7 µs | -16.53% |
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_dict_tight_loop[10000] |
675.9 µs | 773.5 µs | -12.61% |
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 10, 100)] |
1.5 ms | 1.7 ms | -12.01% |
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 1000, 100)] |
2 ms | 2.2 ms | -10.66% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(64, 256)] |
5.2 ms | 4.4 ms | +18.05% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar[65536] |
9.4 µs | 8.3 µs | +13.54% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(1000, 64, 8)] |
1.2 ms | 1 ms | +13.25% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/row-fn-framework (74e0916) with ct/row-fn-types (da08e03)
Footnotes
-
89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩