Execute spatial predicates with RowFn - #9350
Draft
connortsui20 wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Aug 13, 2026
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
✅ 2045 untouched benchmarks
🆕 1 new benchmark
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | nullable_polygons_90pct_x_constant_point |
581.8 µs | 487.6 µs | +19.32% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | nullable_polygons_x_nullable_points |
701.2 µs | 592.6 µs | +18.31% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | nullable_polygons_disjoint_x_constant |
1.7 ms | 1.5 ms | +15.28% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | constant_x_nullable_polygons_disjoint |
1.7 ms | 1.5 ms | +14.95% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | nullable_points_x_constant |
1.5 ms | 1.4 ms | +11.52% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | constant_x_nullable_points |
1.5 ms | 1.4 ms | +11.01% |
| 🆕 | Simulation | constant_x_polygons_overlapping |
N/A | 1.6 ms | N/A |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/row-fn-spatial-predicates (c0f5e8e) with ct/row-fn-spatial-distance (d86f86f)
Footnotes
-
89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading