Execute spatial distance with RowFn - #9349
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 2049 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(64, 256)] |
5.3 ms | 4.4 ms | +20.28% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | nullable_point_column_x_constant_point |
762.6 µs | 666.8 µs | +14.37% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/row-fn-spatial-distance (d86f86f) with ct/row-fn-tensor-products (5e410b5)2
Footnotes
-
89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
ct/row-fn-tensor-products(c3ed052) during the generation of this report, so 5c165e1 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩