Skip to content

Execute primitive comparisons with RowFn - #9346

Draft
connortsui20 wants to merge 9 commits into
ct/row-fn-numeric-operatorsfrom
ct/row-fn-primitive-comparisons
Draft

Execute primitive comparisons with RowFn#9346
connortsui20 wants to merge 9 commits into
ct/row-fn-numeric-operatorsfrom
ct/row-fn-primitive-comparisons

Compile columnar comparison policy only on x86

8c215b8
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Aug 13, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -22.33%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 73 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1917 untouched benchmarks
🆕 36 new benchmarks
⏩ 89 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_10_conditions[10000] 739.8 µs 1,987.7 µs -62.78%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_equality_lookup[10000] 512.9 µs 1,147.7 µs -55.31%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_early_dominant[10000] 381.9 µs 763.7 µs -50%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_3_conditions[10000] 383.5 µs 766.6 µs -49.97%
❌ Simulation case_when_all_false[100000] 1.1 ms 2.1 ms -49.39%
❌ Simulation case_when_all_true[100000] 1.1 ms 2.1 ms -49.16%
❌ Simulation case_when_simple[100000] 1.2 ms 2.3 ms -48.74%
❌ Simulation case_when_without_else[100000] 1.3 ms 2.4 ms -46.97%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_10_conditions[1000] 398.8 µs 697.8 µs -42.85%
❌ Simulation case_when_all_false[10000] 210.7 µs 343.5 µs -38.68%
❌ Simulation case_when_all_true[10000] 215.3 µs 346.9 µs -37.94%
❌ Simulation case_when_simple[10000] 243.3 µs 373 µs -34.78%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_equality_lookup[1000] 307.5 µs 465.1 µs -33.89%
❌ Simulation case_when_without_else[10000] 260.9 µs 391.6 µs -33.37%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(5000, 10000)] 184.3 µs 273.2 µs -32.54%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(7500, 10000)] 245.3 µs 352 µs -30.31%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(3333, 10000)] 160.2 µs 229.7 µs -30.28%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_early_dominant[1000] 224.1 µs 321.1 µs -30.21%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_3_conditions[1000] 226.1 µs 323.3 µs -30.07%
❌ Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2500, 10000)] 146.3 µs 208.5 µs -29.84%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing ct/row-fn-primitive-comparisons (8c215b8) with develop (1a493b6)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 89 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on ct/row-fn-numeric-operators (b7eb750) during the generation of this report, so develop (1a493b6) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ