Better sort pushdown for DF#8557
Performance Regression: -8.08%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1583 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] |
15.9 µs | 26.7 µs | -40.29% |
| ❌ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] |
169.1 µs | 205.8 µs | -17.83% |
| ❌ | Simulation | slice_empty_vortex |
310 ns | 368.3 ns | -15.84% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(100, 100)] |
259.6 µs | 224.5 µs | +15.65% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(100, 100)] |
306.8 µs | 271.9 µs | +12.84% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
273.6 ns | 244.4 ns | +11.93% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/better-sort-pushdown (e5affee) with develop (a9a3c27)
Footnotes
-
4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩