Updated Variant array and the new VariantGet expression #7877
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 32 improved benchmarks
✅ 1184 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 0.05)] |
168.5 µs | 132 µs | +27.59% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 0.1)] |
320.4 µs | 247.6 µs | +29.42% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 0.5)] |
1.5 ms | 1.2 ms | +31.01% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.005, 1.0)] |
3.1 ms | 2.3 ms | +31.24% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 0.05)] |
179.6 µs | 143.1 µs | +25.45% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 0.1)] |
341.3 µs | 268.5 µs | +27.13% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 0.5)] |
1.6 ms | 1.3 ms | +28.56% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.01, 1.0)] |
3.3 ms | 2.5 ms | +28.76% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 0.05)] |
249.2 µs | 212.8 µs | +17.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 0.1)] |
458.8 µs | 385.9 µs | +18.88% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 0.5)] |
2.2 ms | 1.8 ms | +20.39% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search[(0.1, 1.0)] |
4.3 ms | 3.5 ms | +20.62% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.05)] |
193.3 µs | 162.3 µs | +19.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.1)] |
369.3 µs | 307.4 µs | +20.16% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 0.5)] |
1.8 ms | 1.5 ms | +21.06% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.005, 1.0)] |
3.5 ms | 2.9 ms | +21.19% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.05)] |
206.3 µs | 175.4 µs | +17.67% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.1)] |
394 µs | 332.1 µs | +18.65% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 0.5)] |
1.9 ms | 1.6 ms | +19.48% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_search_chunked[(0.01, 1.0)] |
3.8 ms | 3.2 ms | +19.59% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing adamg/yet-another-variant-array (0ff0f40) with develop (7349cd6)
Footnotes
-
24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩