Widen VarBinBuilder offets during FSST compress

[connortsui20]

Summary

Fixes: #7833

I don't think that a more complicated solution here makes a lot of sense. We narrow these offsets is the compressor anyways, so there is no reason to do something more complicated than this.

Additionally adds the logic for comparing with arrow large binary arrays that was missing before.

To be honest, I feel like it doesn't really make any sense to allow the user to specify what the offsets and sizes types should be at all, I think we can have the builder always use the 64-bit types because we know that they will be compressed by the compressor anyways.

Testing

Adds some regression tests. I've ignored the big test because it allocates too much memory.

You can run the ignored test with:

cargo t --release -p vortex-fsst varbin_compress_offsets_overflow_i32 -- --ignored --no-capture

[joseph-isaacs]

please have the test run in ci. what is the problem with doing it?

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.69%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1204 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	take_map[(0.1, 0.5)]	1,111.5 µs	989.4 µs	+12.34%
⚡	Simulation	take_map[(0.1, 1.0)]	1.8 ms	1.6 ms	+11.81%
❌	Simulation	eq_pushdown_high_match	1.1 ms	1.3 ms	-14.44%
❌	Simulation	eq_pushdown_low_match	982.4 µs	1,165.3 µs	-15.69%

---

_{Comparing ct/offsets-i64 (0275c57) with develop (ff12040)}

[connortsui20]

Oh I forgot about test with