Skip to content

perf intersect by rank#7098

Closed
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
ji/intersect_by_rank-impl
Closed

perf intersect by rank#7098
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
ji/intersect_by_rank-impl

Conversation

@joseph-isaacs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Closes: #000

Testing

Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <joe.isaacs@live.co.uk>
@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs changed the title perf perf intersect by rank Mar 20, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.36%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 1014 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1522 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] 535.6 ns 477.2 ns +12.22%
Simulation bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] 376.1 ns 317.8 ns +18.36%

Comparing ji/intersect_by_rank-impl (f8a735f) with develop (bb45280)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1522 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

…nk-impl

Signed-off-by: Joe Isaacs <joe.isaacs@live.co.uk>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has been marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Please comment or remove the stale label if you wish to keep it active, otherwise it will be closed in 7 days

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale This PR is stale and will be auto-closed soon label Apr 15, 2026
@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs removed the stale This PR is stale and will be auto-closed soon label Apr 15, 2026
@robert3005
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

done in #7744

@robert3005 robert3005 closed this May 8, 2026
@robert3005 robert3005 deleted the ji/intersect_by_rank-impl branch May 8, 2026 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants