Skip to content

Use execution where ExecutionCtx is already in scope

886f62f
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Use execute where possible #6835

Use execution where ExecutionCtx is already in scope
886f62f
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Mar 7, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -11%

⚡ 20 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 958 untouched benchmarks
🆕 20 new benchmarks
⏩ 1466 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation take_map[(0.1, 0.5)] 2.6 ms 2.1 ms +24.93%
Simulation take_map[(0.1, 1.0)] 4.2 ms 3.5 ms +19.07%
Simulation take_map[(0.1, 0.1)] 1,007.5 µs 905.7 µs +11.23%
🆕 Simulation sequence_decompress_u32 N/A 4.1 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation sequence_compress_u32 N/A 5.2 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000, 16)] N/A 30.8 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000, 4)] N/A 42.6 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(10000, 1024)] N/A 112.3 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(100000, 1024)] N/A 946.7 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(10000, 256)] N/A 113.1 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000, 256)] N/A 28.5 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(100000, 16)] N/A 1.2 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(10000, 16)] N/A 135.8 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(100000, 4096)] N/A 944.6 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000000, 1024)] N/A 9.3 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(100000, 256)] N/A 958.1 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000000, 4)] N/A 19 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000000, 256)] N/A 9.4 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000000, 16)] N/A 11.7 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation decompress_utf8[(1000000, 4096)] N/A 9.3 ms N/A
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.


Comparing ngates/use-execute (886f62f) with develop (5d6a3c8)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1466 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on develop (6a34208) during the generation of this report, so 5d6a3c8 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.