Skip to content

fix(docs): remove scroll-smooth to fix navigation scroll position#1694

Open
christopherkindl wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ck/scroll-fix
Open

fix(docs): remove scroll-smooth to fix navigation scroll position#1694
christopherkindl wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ck/scroll-fix

Conversation

@christopherkindl
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@christopherkindl christopherkindl commented Apr 10, 2026

Summary

  • Removes the scroll-smooth CSS class from the <html> element in the docs root layout
  • The global smooth scroll was causing Next.js navigation scroll-to-top to animate instead of jumping instantly, making cross-page links (e.g. "World Interface Docs" on /worlds) appear stuck at the previous scroll position
  • Components that need smooth scrolling (e.g. the "Scroll to top" button) already use behavior: 'smooth' explicitly and are unaffected

…sition

The global `scroll-smooth` CSS class on <html> caused Next.js navigation
scroll-to-top to animate instead of jumping instantly, making cross-page
links appear stuck at the previous scroll position.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Apr 10, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 11:46pm

@christopherkindl christopherkindl requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2026 23:45
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d762d78

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.038s (+3.6%) 1.005s (~) 0.967s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.042s (+1.7%) 1.005s (~) 0.963s 10 1.13x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.061s (+6.8% 🔺) 1.010s (~) 0.949s 10 1.63x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.075s (+11.5% 🔺) 1.023s (+1.1%) 0.948s 10 1.98x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.752s (+187.4% 🔺) 2.970s (+31.5% 🔺) 2.218s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 1.092s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.913s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.123s (~) 2.007s (~) 0.883s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.153s (~) 2.008s (~) 0.855s 10 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.162s (+1.0%) 2.011s (~) 0.849s 10 1.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.831s (-10.5% 🟢) 3.731s (-9.0% 🟢) 1.899s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 10.629s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.394s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.890s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.133s 3 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.897s (~) 11.022s (~) 0.126s 3 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 10.915s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.108s 3 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 16.835s (-4.4%) 18.897s (-3.9%) 2.061s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 14.168s (-0.5%) 15.029s (~) 0.860s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.614s (+0.5%) 15.024s (~) 0.410s 4 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.624s (~) 15.022s (~) 0.398s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 14.930s (-0.5%) 15.028s (~) 0.098s 4 1.05x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 31.095s (-18.9% 🟢) 33.288s (-17.3% 🟢) 2.193s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 14.001s (-0.9%) 14.453s (-1.9%) 0.452s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.230s (+2.0%) 15.024s (+5.0%) 0.794s 6 1.02x
💻 Local Express 14.800s (-1.6%) 15.027s (-3.2%) 0.227s 6 1.06x
💻 Local Nitro 16.529s (-1.3%) 17.031s (~) 0.502s 6 1.18x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 54.303s (-9.0% 🟢) 56.472s (-8.6% 🟢) 2.169s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.238s (-3.4%) 2.008s (~) 0.771s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.274s (~) 2.008s (~) 0.734s 15 1.03x
💻 Local Express 1.469s (+1.9%) 2.005s (~) 0.536s 15 1.19x
💻 Local Nitro 1.520s (~) 2.005s (~) 0.485s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.325s (-11.0% 🟢) 4.302s (-4.1%) 1.977s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.345s (-0.5%) 3.008s (~) 0.664s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.362s (+0.6%) 3.009s (~) 0.647s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 2.778s (+7.8% 🔺) 3.107s (+3.3%) 0.329s 10 1.18x
💻 Local Nitro 3.110s (+4.9%) 3.885s (+3.3%) 0.775s 8 1.33x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.025s (+18.2% 🔺) 4.770s (+14.5% 🔺) 1.745s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.465s (-0.6%) 4.011s (~) 0.545s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.477s (~) 4.009s (~) 0.532s 8 1.00x
💻 Local Express 6.785s (+1.0%) 7.015s (~) 0.230s 5 1.96x
💻 Local Nitro 7.837s (-6.4% 🟢) 8.269s (-8.4% 🟢) 0.432s 4 2.26x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.832s (-12.0% 🟢) 5.131s (+1.5%) 2.299s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.257s (-0.7%) 2.008s (~) 0.751s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.266s (~) 2.008s (~) 0.742s 15 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.454s (-0.9%) 2.005s (~) 0.552s 15 1.16x
💻 Local Nitro 1.491s (-2.1%) 2.006s (~) 0.514s 15 1.19x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.844s (-17.3% 🟢) 3.859s (-4.1%) 2.015s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.325s (-1.6%) 3.009s (~) 0.684s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.354s (~) 3.010s (~) 0.655s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 2.724s (-8.4% 🟢) 3.007s (-10.0% 🟢) 0.283s 10 1.17x
💻 Local Nitro 3.016s (-2.6%) 3.455s (-13.8% 🟢) 0.439s 9 1.30x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.406s (-16.6% 🟢) 4.123s (-11.9% 🟢) 1.717s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.455s (-1.5%) 4.010s (~) 0.555s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.469s (-0.8%) 4.010s (~) 0.541s 8 1.00x
💻 Local Express 7.561s (-6.0% 🟢) 8.018s (-8.6% 🟢) 0.457s 4 2.19x
💻 Local Nitro 8.581s (-8.1% 🟢) 9.022s (-10.0% 🟢) 0.441s 4 2.48x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.611s (+7.5% 🔺) 5.334s (-1.8%) 1.723s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.680s (-2.9%) 1.004s (~) 0.323s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.811s (-3.1%) 1.006s (~) 0.194s 60 1.19x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.818s (-1.9%) 1.006s (~) 0.188s 60 1.20x
💻 Local Nitro 0.976s (-1.4%) 1.095s (-12.7% 🟢) 0.120s 55 1.43x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 8.726s (-19.4% 🟢) 10.788s (-14.9% 🟢) 2.062s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.933s (~) 2.075s (-7.8% 🟢) 0.142s 44 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.949s (-0.8%) 2.203s (-1.1%) 0.254s 41 1.01x
💻 Local Express 2.212s (-9.4% 🟢) 3.007s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.796s 30 1.14x
💻 Local Nitro 3.175s (+5.2% 🔺) 3.546s (-1.1%) 0.371s 26 1.64x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 29.434s (~) 31.403s (-0.5%) 1.969s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.997s (-0.6%) 4.455s (~) 0.458s 27 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 4.024s (+3.4%) 4.529s (+9.2% 🔺) 0.505s 27 1.01x
💻 Local Express 7.291s (~) 7.952s (~) 0.661s 16 1.82x
💻 Local Nitro 9.038s (-2.3%) 9.479s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.441s 13 2.26x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 75.983s (-0.9%) 77.972s (-1.8%) 1.989s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.281s (+1.9%) 1.007s (~) 0.726s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.285s (+1.0%) 1.007s (~) 0.722s 60 1.02x
💻 Local Express 0.562s (-3.6%) 1.004s (~) 0.442s 60 2.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.579s (~) 1.021s (+1.6%) 0.442s 59 2.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.365s (-15.5% 🟢) 3.055s (-11.8% 🟢) 1.690s 20 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.488s (-2.4%) 1.006s (~) 0.518s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.493s (-1.9%) 1.006s (~) 0.513s 90 1.01x
💻 Local Express 2.427s (+1.3%) 3.008s (~) 0.580s 30 4.98x
💻 Local Nitro 2.446s (-1.2%) 3.008s (~) 0.562s 30 5.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.493s (+10.7% 🔺) 5.198s (+6.5% 🔺) 1.705s 18 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.780s (~) 1.016s (+0.8%) 0.236s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.819s (+3.7%) 1.018s (+1.0%) 0.199s 118 1.05x
💻 Local Express 10.385s (+3.8%) 11.023s (+3.1%) 0.638s 11 13.31x
💻 Local Nitro 10.966s (-1.3%) 11.392s (-3.8%) 0.426s 11 14.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 41.938s (+618.6% 🔺) 43.879s (+463.1% 🔺) 1.941s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.141s (+0.9%) 1.004s (~) 0.009s (~) 1.015s (~) 0.874s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.197s (-3.1%) 1.004s (~) 0.011s (-4.2%) 1.017s (~) 0.821s 10 1.39x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.198s (-7.1% 🟢) 0.997s (~) 0.001s (+7.7% 🔺) 1.009s (~) 0.811s 10 1.40x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.219s (+6.1% 🔺) 1.000s (~) 0.001s (~) 1.011s (~) 0.792s 10 1.55x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.469s (-19.2% 🟢) 2.776s (-18.4% 🟢) 0.465s (+75.3% 🔺) 3.915s (-7.0% 🟢) 2.446s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.576s (+3.3%) 1.011s (~) 0.010s (+8.7% 🔺) 1.022s (~) 0.446s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.615s (~) 1.002s (~) 0.004s (+5.5% 🔺) 1.022s (~) 0.406s 59 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.628s (+3.3%) 1.004s (~) 0.004s (-21.3% 🟢) 1.022s (~) 0.394s 59 1.09x
💻 Local Nitro 0.719s (-1.1%) 1.012s (~) 0.009s (-4.0%) 1.023s (~) 0.304s 59 1.25x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.229s (-7.3% 🟢) 5.896s (-8.7% 🟢) 0.331s (+12.0% 🔺) 6.754s (-9.0% 🟢) 2.525s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.953s (-2.8%) 1.086s (-8.9% 🟢) 0.000s (-53.6% 🟢) 1.099s (-9.7% 🟢) 0.147s 55 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.993s (+5.1% 🔺) 1.330s (+13.8% 🔺) 0.000s (-24.4% 🟢) 1.342s (+13.3% 🔺) 0.348s 45 1.04x
💻 Local Express 1.168s (+2.5%) 2.019s (~) 0.000s (+25.0% 🔺) 2.021s (~) 0.853s 30 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 1.207s (-2.6%) 2.020s (~) 0.000s (-37.5% 🟢) 2.022s (~) 0.815s 30 1.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.921s (-1.8%) 4.343s (-6.8% 🟢) 0.000s (-88.5% 🟢) 4.856s (-6.5% 🟢) 1.935s 13 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.716s (-2.7%) 2.101s (~) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.114s (~) 0.399s 29 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.728s (-2.9%) 2.142s (~) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.153s (~) 0.426s 28 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 3.453s (-1.4%) 4.102s (~) 0.000s (-57.1% 🟢) 4.105s (~) 0.651s 15 2.01x
💻 Local Express 3.543s (+8.2% 🔺) 3.970s (+1.6%) 0.000s (-54.5% 🟢) 3.973s (+1.6%) 0.430s 16 2.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 5.152s (+22.2% 🔺) 6.639s (+16.3% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 7.118s (+14.5% 🔺) 1.966s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Express 20/21
🐘 Postgres Nitro 13/21
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 21/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 14/21
Next.js (Turbopack) ▲ Vercel 21/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 18/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 923 0 67 990
✅ 💻 Local Development 822 0 168 990
✅ 📦 Local Production 898 0 182 1080
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 898 0 182 1080
✅ 🪟 Windows 82 0 8 90
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 133 74 24 231
✅ 📋 Other 228 0 42 270
Total 3984 74 673 4731

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)

mongodb (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNWWNMWS418A6MNJF9YFP006
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWNY9KVKWPQA0BKQWXK2E3
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWSTJBVNR4NEJF27QEQN6S
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNWWY1WJ6A8FCYEBXYQZJRQ0
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNWX4YKWBPY5AAGBZSY529HJ

redis (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNWWNMWS418A6MNJF9YFP006
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWNY9KVKWPQA0BKQWXK2E3
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWSTJBVNR4NEJF27QEQN6S
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNWWY1WJ6A8FCYEBXYQZJRQ0
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNWX4YKWBPY5AAGBZSY529HJ

turso (60 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWMF5TC1SX4QP5DXRMEYHS
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWMF5TC1SX4QP5DXRMEYHS
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KNWWNBMEJXHKJ3D5CBQBJPHT
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWMP4GTQWB2YHQKPJTCYKA
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWMTQ61BDSPDZ6NBSGPQ70
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWMWYD4PXZWTC0GD9QEDA7
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWNPKNH2KCXSGQYEHP4V92
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWN8ZK0B3XRAZH6N2PGE2D
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNWWNMWS418A6MNJF9YFP006
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWNY9KVKWPQA0BKQWXK2E3
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWP4WK3QDFPA5CGPF7TXZK
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWPJ03AB6PMMFKEE8VFY9T
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWQ2J85J1P4QJDRH3TXG2N
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWQ5ET85Q4QKGDAGYADAE0
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWSTJBVNR4NEJF27QEQN6S
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KNWWSYFC4CJWD0DEMK3W2BG1
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KNWWXD2S9KRGV4ZWCTGSHBDQ
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNWWY1WJ6A8FCYEBXYQZJRQ0
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KNWWYQFCY4ZVZHCP8C25R697
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KNWWZC6HA3B361X5KPJM3MDP
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KNWWZNBEE37A9R5J7QJM5GGB
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KNWWZV29SVVGKPKG0S5MF9TJ
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KNWWZXCVGFXXT3HT1M2FTPC8
  • runClassSerializationWorkflow - Run instances serialize across workflow/step boundaries | wrun_01KNWX0A97WDMGH1N9N9PCVDF9
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KNWX0RM5G6AFG7XR3GNS4ASB
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KNWX0YBBC46HT3D96Q14R5WP
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KNWX156VGKCKD446KY68B4EN
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KNWX1BT9ME0N2Q4Q082ACVKK
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KNWX1HYK8E0K961D8CRBFKV1
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KNWX1RGQEH8F2PD0K9R95S71
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNWX1Z5WDQB8B91KPC5G3TX7
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KNWX2B8YV1WMWEWE23TSGYM3
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KNWX2K47K8ZEJTFNAAB4B7AF
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNWX2T4S98X2RH3FC7T8TQHK
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNWX33FA5MST4308P8AD5J7P
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNWX3FA07BYWV988K1Y2A2TD
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KNWX44FZK5NCDWE4FAN56HSJ
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KNWX4JKSKGQ6J827CTEANFT2
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KNWX4T68B3Y8KT0P96QHR06B
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KNWX4WCR044PRPX5PPYRWDHH
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNWX4YKWBPY5AAGBZSY529HJ
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNWX51ZT7HK9DPD30NQ1QKDE

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 83 0 7
✅ example 83 0 7
✅ express 83 0 7
✅ fastify 83 0 7
✅ hono 83 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 88 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 88 0 2
✅ nitro 83 0 7
✅ nuxt 83 0 7
✅ sveltekit 83 0 7
✅ vite 83 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 82 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 6 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 7 8
✅ redis-dev 6 0 0
❌ redis 56 7 8
✅ turso-dev 6 0 0
❌ turso 3 60 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 76 0 14

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: success
  • Local Dev: failure
  • Local Prod: success
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants