Skip to content

Gitignore public workflow manifests#1683

Open
pranaygp wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
pranaygp/codex/colocated-manifest-gitignore
Open

Gitignore public workflow manifests#1683
pranaygp wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
pranaygp/codex/colocated-manifest-gitignore

Conversation

@pranaygp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pranaygp pranaygp commented Apr 10, 2026

Summary

  • write colocated .gitignore files into the public/static manifest output directories created when WORKFLOW_PUBLIC_MANIFEST=1
  • apply the same simple generated-directory pattern already used for other .well-known/workflow outputs instead of touching the project root .gitignore
  • cover the affected builders: Vercel Build Output API, Next.js eager/deferred, and SvelteKit

Closes #1521

Testing

  • not run locally in this worktree because dependencies are not installed (node_modules is missing)

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Apr 10, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 10, 2026 7:20am
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:20am

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 10, 2026 05:50
@pranaygp pranaygp requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2026 05:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 921 2 67 990
✅ 💻 Local Development 746 0 154 900
❌ 📦 Local Production 897 1 182 1080
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 898 0 182 1080
✅ 🪟 Windows 82 0 8 90
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 133 74 24 231
✅ 📋 Other 228 0 42 270
Total 3905 77 659 4641

❌ Failed Tests

▲ Vercel Production (2 failed)

fastify (1 failed):

nextjs-turbopack (1 failed):

  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNV4MH4KTM9W6BVZVK6N2M5A | 🔍 observability
📦 Local Production (1 failed)

fastify-stable (1 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV47V33PYRFZCBSES2GCHAH
🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)

mongodb (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV47V33PYRFZCBSES2GCHAH
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV483KR5DW0VARMH3EFSMYT
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNV4BPKQT2A2H2B6VT11WB9Q
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNV4FND1EBFKG9W024MS5X9F
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNV4NRR237DRKRZ1JM4SQ23M

redis (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV47V33PYRFZCBSES2GCHAH
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV483KR5DW0VARMH3EFSMYT
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNV4BPKQT2A2H2B6VT11WB9Q
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNV4FND1EBFKG9W024MS5X9F
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNV4NRR237DRKRZ1JM4SQ23M

turso (60 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNV46Q7PECG4CBC7FNAH2X51
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNV46Q7PECG4CBC7FNAH2X51
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KNV48FVJ1EKG4SAA9EW1Y6AY
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KNV46Y7NPPRHC44SF7FF0SJ5
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KNV473F76J0VGMH4Q5A0MEK7
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KNV475BVMP4EFED6S3YMQSF1
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KNV48VSXWAVB1AKDKD1ZYHP9
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV47GWKKP0G9QKM8GVRA45C
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNV47V33PYRFZCBSES2GCHAH
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNV483KR5DW0VARMH3EFSMYT
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KNV48AXD2J3PTXAV23FNNNVX
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KNV48PQX1NTYASB644NHSS94
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KNV48TTXB054VKKHMKX13KA8
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KNV48WQ1ZF43W2K80Q53R4BM
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNV4BPKQT2A2H2B6VT11WB9Q
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KNV4BSRV8TNTDEVYT7T9XMYQ
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KNV4F2N8BRKE831B8G1NX72T
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNV4FND1EBFKG9W024MS5X9F
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KNV4G97B5R71H8WG89DSSTCX
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KNV4GVNADSAS14DPGBQJ56MW
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KNV4H39MR3JG9FDT4X12MQK1
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KNV4H822GC47QXGN65QM6CZ6
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KNV4H9ZENFTNTDAQHENVQCMD
  • runClassSerializationWorkflow - Run instances serialize across workflow/step boundaries | wrun_01KNV4HKZVV34M85NHMVP0NRT4
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KNV4J18PBVVZ739G9MSGWMRW
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KNV4J5WR27X886RCASG68J7Q
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KNV4JBQ6MSQDAR6YT72VJHS5
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KNV4JHJ1CY4G8ASYCSYHWZZG
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KNV4JQEHZ6ZB9TGPNGBFWHNS
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KNV4JYV21HR5W9NMHX8JBC5B
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNV4K4QSB9KD58Y64VDWRYZB
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KNV4KEDWSQCYKQRNKERRFD4H
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KNV4KPEVCZCAGV20XRPGZ9NW
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNV4KX8EYRGFHMY1QGPZ43E0
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNV4M65QNTPHVVJPRYBHAYPT
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNV4MH4KTM9W6BVZVK6N2M5A
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KNV4N416SVERB0ST6XMPG9JQ
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KNV4NETN77KRFWGTQT9SFZPR
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KNV4NMN5HNMVEKEX0RNMKXWS
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KNV4NPNDSH3K4WPTZR7YKPW2
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNV4NRR237DRKRZ1JM4SQ23M
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNV4NVN8MTA95P7B2457447W

Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 83 0 7
✅ example 83 0 7
✅ express 83 0 7
❌ fastify 82 1 7
✅ hono 83 0 7
❌ nextjs-turbopack 87 1 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 88 0 2
✅ nitro 83 0 7
✅ nuxt 83 0 7
✅ sveltekit 83 0 7
✅ vite 83 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
❌ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
❌ fastify-stable 75 1 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 82 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 6 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 7 8
✅ redis-dev 6 0 0
❌ redis 56 7 8
✅ turso-dev 6 0 0
❌ turso 3 60 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 76 0 14

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: failure
  • Local Dev: failure
  • Local Prod: failure
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: ec0b575

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch
@workflow/ai Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.043s (+16.2% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.962s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.047s 1.005s 0.958s 10 1.09x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.057s 1.009s 0.953s 10 1.32x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.065s (+2.5%) 1.011s (~) 0.946s 10 1.50x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.066s (-0.9%) 1.012s (~) 0.946s 10 1.52x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.236s (-2.4%) 2.025s (-4.7%) 1.789s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.240s (-45.9% 🟢) 2.139s (-3.7%) 1.899s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.122s 2.005s 0.883s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.132s (+2.7%) 2.006s (~) 0.873s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.140s 2.011s 0.871s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.146s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.864s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.146s (~) 2.011s (~) 0.865s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.917s (-7.5% 🟢) 3.567s (-3.4%) 1.651s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.925s (+2.9%) 4.077s (+6.1% 🔺) 2.152s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 10.825s 11.024s 0.198s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.833s 11.021s 0.188s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.910s (+0.5%) 11.021s (~) 0.111s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.940s (+0.7%) 11.019s (~) 0.079s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 10.955s (+2.7%) 11.024s (~) 0.069s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 19.383s (+9.1% 🔺) 20.908s (+10.3% 🔺) 1.525s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 19.990s (+19.4% 🔺) 22.418s (+19.7% 🔺) 2.428s 2 1.03x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 14.540s 15.026s 0.486s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.596s (~) 15.023s (~) 0.427s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.614s (+0.8%) 15.019s (~) 0.406s 4 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 14.621s 15.031s 0.409s 4 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 14.956s (+5.2% 🔺) 15.029s (~) 0.073s 4 1.03x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 32.074s (+6.4% 🔺) 34.248s (+6.2% 🔺) 2.174s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 32.741s (-3.5%) 33.720s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.979s 2 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 13.863s 14.167s 0.304s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 13.928s (~) 14.306s (+2.0%) 0.378s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.155s (~) 15.022s (+1.9%) 0.867s 6 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 16.006s 16.364s 0.359s 6 1.15x
💻 Local Nitro 16.623s (+11.4% 🔺) 17.029s (+13.3% 🔺) 0.406s 6 1.20x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 54.705s (+4.1%) 56.703s (+3.6%) 1.998s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 55.394s (+1.2%) 57.017s (~) 1.624s 2 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.223s 2.009s 0.786s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.254s (-1.4%) 2.009s (~) 0.755s 15 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.268s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.742s 15 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 1.478s (-1.1%) 2.006s (~) 0.527s 15 1.21x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.577s 2.073s 0.496s 15 1.29x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.615s (+10.2% 🔺) 4.542s (+9.9% 🔺) 1.927s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.641s (+11.2% 🔺) 3.982s (+2.9%) 1.341s 8 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.354s (~) 3.009s (~) 0.654s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.404s (+3.2%) 3.010s (~) 0.606s 10 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.450s 3.011s 0.561s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.843s (+4.2%) 3.108s (-3.1%) 0.265s 10 1.21x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.903s 3.208s 0.305s 10 1.23x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.719s (-10.1% 🟢) 3.968s (-9.9% 🟢) 1.249s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.235s (+59.9% 🔺) 6.139s (+49.7% 🔺) 1.903s 6 1.56x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.468s (-1.0%) 4.012s (~) 0.543s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.470s (-0.9%) 4.010s (~) 0.540s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.703s 4.011s 0.308s 8 1.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.207s 7.767s 0.560s 4 2.08x
💻 Local Nitro 7.875s (+1.7%) 8.523s (~) 0.647s 4 2.27x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.686s (-8.9% 🟢) 4.672s (-0.9%) 1.986s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.900s (+28.4% 🔺) 5.656s (+22.8% 🔺) 1.756s 6 1.45x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.220s 2.009s 0.789s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.250s (-0.7%) 2.008s (~) 0.759s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.261s (-2.7%) 2.008s (~) 0.747s 15 1.03x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.482s 2.006s 0.524s 15 1.22x
💻 Local Nitro 1.525s (+1.3%) 2.005s (~) 0.480s 15 1.25x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.041s (+6.0% 🔺) 3.962s (+6.7% 🔺) 1.921s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.161s (~) 3.570s (~) 1.409s 9 1.06x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.328s (-2.2%) 3.010s (~) 0.682s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.341s (~) 3.011s (~) 0.670s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 2.390s 3.009s 0.619s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 2.818s (-19.4% 🟢) 3.108s (-22.5% 🟢) 0.290s 10 1.21x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.011s 3.564s 0.553s 9 1.29x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.275s (-13.1% 🟢) 4.157s (-5.8% 🟢) 1.882s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.986s (+20.4% 🔺) 4.430s (+14.5% 🔺) 1.445s 8 1.31x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.470s (~) 4.010s (~) 0.541s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.476s (~) 4.011s (~) 0.535s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.658s 4.014s 0.356s 8 1.05x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 7.852s 8.516s 0.665s 4 2.26x
💻 Local Nitro 8.042s (-5.4% 🟢) 8.773s (-2.8%) 0.731s 4 2.32x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.163s (-8.7% 🟢) 4.604s (-4.4%) 1.441s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.239s (+10.4% 🔺) 5.090s (+20.8% 🔺) 1.850s 6 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.775s 1.006s 0.231s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.808s (-3.3%) 1.006s (-1.6%) 0.198s 60 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.834s (-3.5%) 1.006s (~) 0.172s 60 1.08x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.904s 1.076s 0.172s 56 1.17x
💻 Local Nitro 1.009s (+37.0% 🔺) 1.505s (+49.8% 🔺) 0.496s 40 1.30x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 9.497s (+3.3%) 11.423s (+4.0%) 1.926s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 10.318s (+15.4% 🔺) 11.927s (+11.9% 🔺) 1.610s 6 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.891s 2.099s 0.208s 43 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.899s (-2.3%) 2.076s (-1.2%) 0.177s 44 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.013s (-6.7% 🟢) 2.536s (-14.8% 🟢) 0.523s 36 1.06x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.793s 3.008s 0.214s 30 1.48x
💻 Local Nitro 3.034s (+18.2% 🔺) 3.690s (+16.0% 🔺) 0.656s 25 1.60x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 28.767s (+2.8%) 30.982s (+3.5%) 2.215s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 29.065s (+1.5%) 30.723s (+1.2%) 1.658s 3 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.833s 4.010s 0.177s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.877s (-2.8%) 4.109s (-4.4%) 0.232s 30 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.011s (-7.0% 🟢) 4.492s (-10.4% 🟢) 0.481s 27 1.05x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 8.627s 9.017s 0.390s 14 2.25x
💻 Local Nitro 8.973s (+16.3% 🔺) 9.402s (+14.4% 🔺) 0.429s 13 2.34x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 72.386s (-7.7% 🟢) 74.515s (-7.1% 🟢) 2.129s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 80.868s (+5.1% 🔺) 82.713s (+5.0% 🔺) 1.845s 2 1.12x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.253s 1.007s 0.753s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.277s (-6.2% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.730s 60 1.10x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.301s (+6.8% 🔺) 1.007s (~) 0.706s 60 1.19x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.563s 1.004s 0.442s 60 2.22x
💻 Local Nitro 0.596s (-10.2% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.409s 60 2.35x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.526s (~) 3.238s (+4.5%) 1.712s 19 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.888s (+30.3% 🔺) 3.337s (+10.9% 🔺) 1.450s 19 1.24x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.488s 1.007s 0.518s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.492s (-6.3% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.514s 90 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.497s (+1.8%) 1.006s (~) 0.509s 90 1.02x
💻 Local Nitro 2.450s (-10.8% 🟢) 3.009s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.559s 30 5.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.521s 3.008s 0.487s 30 5.16x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.679s (-2.2%) 4.656s (+7.1% 🔺) 1.977s 20 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.053s (-9.3% 🟢) 4.534s (-6.1% 🟢) 1.480s 20 1.14x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.782s 1.007s 0.225s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.800s (+1.8%) 1.009s (~) 0.208s 119 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.835s (-0.6%) 1.010s (-0.9%) 0.175s 119 1.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.465s 11.118s 0.653s 11 13.39x
💻 Local Nitro 10.536s (-5.4% 🟢) 11.030s (-6.9% 🟢) 0.494s 11 13.48x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 5.634s (-22.2% 🟢) 7.182s (-16.6% 🟢) 1.549s 17 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 6.259s (-8.6% 🟢) 8.323s (-4.3%) 2.064s 15 1.11x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.180s 1.002s 0.010s 1.016s 0.836s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.193s 1.002s 0.002s 1.012s 0.819s 10 1.07x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.204s (+2.3%) 0.997s (~) 0.001s (-12.5% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.806s 10 1.13x
💻 Local Nitro 0.207s (+40.5% 🔺) 1.004s (~) 0.010s (+5.5% 🔺) 1.016s (~) 0.808s 10 1.15x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.215s (~) 0.996s (~) 0.001s (-35.3% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.795s 10 1.20x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.422s (-12.9% 🟢) 2.617s (-12.0% 🟢) 0.656s (+52.6% 🔺) 3.675s (-3.0%) 2.253s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.987s (+34.3% 🔺) 3.316s (+9.6% 🔺) 0.425s (+40.2% 🔺) 4.324s (+14.8% 🔺) 2.337s 10 1.40x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.608s 1.009s 0.006s 1.024s 0.416s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.613s (+1.3%) 1.005s (~) 0.004s (~) 1.023s (~) 0.410s 59 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.627s (-3.1%) 1.005s (~) 0.004s (-22.9% 🟢) 1.022s (~) 0.395s 59 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 0.745s (+12.6% 🔺) 1.013s (~) 0.009s (-13.0% 🟢) 1.024s (~) 0.279s 59 1.22x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.775s 1.010s 0.009s 1.115s 0.340s 54 1.27x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.136s (-2.1%) 5.991s (+2.4%) 0.270s (+22.6% 🔺) 6.783s (+4.5%) 2.647s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.642s (+12.9% 🔺) 6.200s (+11.0% 🔺) 0.316s (-56.4% 🟢) 6.899s (+3.3%) 2.256s 9 1.12x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.932s 1.155s 0.000s 1.162s 0.230s 52 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.957s (-3.6%) 1.173s (-12.2% 🟢) 0.000s (+29.4% 🔺) 1.185s (-13.5% 🟢) 0.229s 51 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.965s (+2.1%) 1.145s (~) 0.000s (-34.6% 🟢) 1.159s (~) 0.194s 53 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 1.197s (-9.7% 🟢) 2.020s (~) 0.000s (-29.4% 🟢) 2.022s (~) 0.826s 30 1.28x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.294s 2.020s 0.001s 2.023s 0.729s 30 1.39x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.617s (-1.0%) 3.861s (+4.0%) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 4.409s (+6.4% 🔺) 1.792s 14 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.160s (-2.9%) 4.506s (+2.7%) 0.002s (+666.7% 🔺) 4.909s (+2.9%) 1.750s 13 1.21x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.768s (-0.8%) 2.141s (+2.1%) 0.000s (+3.6%) 2.152s (+1.9%) 0.384s 28 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.807s (+1.2%) 2.177s (+1.6%) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.204s (+2.4%) 0.396s 28 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.843s 2.181s 0.000s 2.188s 0.345s 28 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 3.259s (-17.4% 🟢) 3.969s (-12.5% 🟢) 0.000s (-44.3% 🟢) 3.973s (-12.4% 🟢) 0.714s 16 1.84x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.785s 4.165s 0.001s 4.170s 0.384s 15 2.14x
💻 Local Express ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.897s (-10.4% 🟢) 5.082s (-8.9% 🟢) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.587s (-6.6% 🟢) 1.690s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.912s (+15.2% 🔺) 5.611s (+15.6% 🔺) 0.000s (-63.6% 🟢) 6.101s (+14.8% 🔺) 2.189s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 13/21
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 16/21
▲ Vercel Express 14/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 18/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🐘 Postgres 16/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: failure
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the builders to write .gitignore files next to generated custom workflow manifest outputs (instead of editing a repo root ignore), and aligns manifest path resolution with the builder workingDir. Also updates the example app to emit the custom manifest under .well-known/workflow/manifest.js.

Changes:

  • Add ensureGeneratedFileGitignore() (with tests) to create/append a colocated .gitignore entry for generated manifests.
  • Resolve workflowManifestPath relative to workingDir and invoke the new gitignore writer after emitting the manifest.
  • Move the example app’s custom manifest output from root manifest.js to .well-known/workflow/manifest.js, removing the old ignore/output wiring.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
workbench/example/turbo.json Removes root manifest.js from Turbo build outputs to match the new manifest location.
workbench/example/package.json Updates example build script to output the manifest under .well-known/workflow/manifest.js.
workbench/example/.gitignore Removes root-level manifest.js ignore since it’s no longer generated there.
packages/builders/src/gitignore.ts New helper that writes/updates colocated .gitignore files for generated outputs.
packages/builders/src/gitignore.test.ts Adds Vitest coverage for the colocated .gitignore behavior.
packages/builders/src/base-builder.ts Resolves manifest paths via workingDir and calls the new gitignore helper after writing the manifest.
.changeset/ignore-generated-manifest.md Changeset entry for the @workflow/builders patch release.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +25 to +33
const resolvedWorkingDir = resolve(workingDir);
const resolvedFilePath = resolve(resolvedWorkingDir, filePath);
const relativePath = normalizeRelativePath(
relative(resolvedWorkingDir, resolvedFilePath)
);

if (!relativePath || isOutsideRoot(relativePath)) {
return false;
}
Comment on lines +40 to +55
const gitignorePath = join(outputDir, '.gitignore');
const entry = basename(resolvedFilePath);

let existing = '';
try {
existing = await readFile(gitignorePath, 'utf8');
} catch (error) {
if ((error as NodeJS.ErrnoException).code !== 'ENOENT') {
throw error;
}
}

const lines = existing.split(/\r?\n/).map((line) => line.trim());
if (lines.includes('*') || lines.includes(entry) || lines.includes(`/${entry}`)) {
return false;
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds automatic .gitignore generation in the public/static manifest output directories created when WORKFLOW_PUBLIC_MANIFEST=1, so generated manifest.json files don’t show up as untracked changes in app repos.

Changes:

  • Write a colocated .gitignore into public/.well-known/workflow/v1 (Next.js eager/deferred) and static/.well-known/workflow/v1 (SvelteKit).
  • Write a colocated .gitignore into .vercel/output/static/.well-known/workflow/v1 (Vercel Build Output API).
  • Add a changeset to publish patch releases for affected packages.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
workbench/example/.gitignore Keeps workbench example ignore rules aligned (no functional change).
packages/sveltekit/src/builder.ts Writes .gitignore into SvelteKit static/.well-known/workflow/v1 when exposing the public manifest.
packages/next/src/builder-eager.ts Writes .gitignore into Next.js public/.well-known/workflow/v1 when exposing the public manifest.
packages/next/src/builder-deferred.ts Writes .gitignore (via writeFileIfChanged) into Next.js public/.well-known/workflow/v1 when exposing the public manifest.
packages/builders/src/vercel-build-output-api.ts Writes .gitignore into build-output static manifest dir when exposing the public manifest.
.changeset/ignore-generated-manifest.md Patch bumps for builders/next/sveltekit with a note about generated .gitignore.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

'static/.well-known/workflow/v1'
);
await mkdir(staticManifestDir, { recursive: true });
await writeFile(join(staticManifestDir, '.gitignore'), '*');
'public/.well-known/workflow/v1'
);
await mkdir(publicManifestDir, { recursive: true });
await writeFile(join(publicManifestDir, '.gitignore'), '*');
Comment on lines +643 to +646
await this.writeFileIfChanged(
join(publicManifestDir, '.gitignore'),
'*'
);
'static/.well-known/workflow/v1'
);
await mkdir(staticManifestDir, { recursive: true });
await writeFile(join(staticManifestDir, '.gitignore'), '*');
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TooTallNate TooTallNate left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The location of the gitignore that copilot flagged seems valid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants