Skip to content

Send siteId as label on feedback GitHub issues#1578

Open
molebox wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feedback-site-id-label
Open

Send siteId as label on feedback GitHub issues#1578
molebox wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
feedback-site-id-label

Conversation

@molebox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@molebox molebox commented Apr 1, 2026

Summary

  • Imports siteId from geistdocs.tsx config and passes it as the label field in the feedback POST body
  • Issues created in vercel/feedback will now be labeled with the originating site
  • Backward-compatible: if siteId is undefined, the platform falls back to "vercel-site"

See vercel/geistdocs#57 for the upstream template change.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Apr 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 2, 2026 3:40pm

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.044s (-1.6%) 1.005s (~) 0.961s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.044s (-1.8%) 1.005s (~) 0.961s 10 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.056s (+27.1% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.949s 10 1.29x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.061s (-12.6% 🟢) 1.012s (~) 0.951s 10 1.40x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.062s (-10.6% 🟢) 1.012s (~) 0.950s 10 1.41x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.545s (+8.1% 🔺) 2.618s (-2.8%) 2.074s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.548s (-7.6% 🟢) 2.628s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.080s 10 1.01x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.126s (-0.5%) 2.006s (~) 0.880s 10 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.128s (+1.4%) 2.007s (~) 0.879s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.128s (~) 2.007s (~) 0.878s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.142s (-0.8%) 2.011s (~) 0.869s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.149s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.861s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.124s (-6.2% 🟢) 3.816s (-3.5%) 1.692s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.165s (+3.5%) 3.847s (-1.4%) 1.682s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 10.798s (+2.0%) 11.024s (~) 0.226s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.857s (-0.9%) 11.023s (~) 0.165s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Express 10.936s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.087s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Nitro 10.940s (~) 11.024s (~) 0.084s 3 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.949s (~) 11.355s (+3.0%) 0.406s 3 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 17.004s (-3.1%) 18.918s (-3.7%) 1.914s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 17.052s (~) 18.839s (-1.5%) 1.787s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 14.296s (+3.0%) 15.029s (+5.6% 🔺) 0.733s 4 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.536s (~) 15.026s (~) 0.490s 4 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.580s (~) 15.026s (~) 0.446s 4 1.02x
💻 Local Express 14.976s (~) 15.029s (~) 0.053s 4 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 14.980s (~) 15.279s (+1.7%) 0.299s 4 1.05x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 31.628s (-4.6%) 33.542s (-4.3%) 1.914s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 32.633s (-6.7% 🟢) 34.534s (-6.2% 🟢) 1.901s 2 1.03x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 13.579s (+7.6% 🔺) 14.026s (+7.7% 🔺) 0.447s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 13.926s (-3.3%) 14.311s (-4.7%) 0.385s 7 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 14.187s (+0.6%) 15.026s (+2.0%) 0.840s 6 1.04x
💻 Local Express 16.642s (~) 17.031s (~) 0.388s 6 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 16.712s (+1.0%) 17.031s (~) 0.320s 6 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 51.706s (-7.9% 🟢) 53.042s (-8.8% 🟢) 1.337s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 56.523s (-5.5% 🟢) 58.383s (-5.2% 🟢) 1.860s 2 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.256s (-1.4%) 2.012s (~) 0.755s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.265s (~) 2.010s (~) 0.745s 15 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.350s (+10.3% 🔺) 2.074s (+3.4%) 0.723s 15 1.07x
💻 Local Express 1.491s (-3.2%) 2.006s (~) 0.515s 15 1.19x
💻 Local Nitro 1.544s (+0.7%) 2.005s (~) 0.461s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.274s (-12.2% 🟢) 3.775s (-15.8% 🟢) 1.501s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.867s (+10.2% 🔺) 4.164s (+2.5%) 1.298s 8 1.26x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.321s (-1.2%) 3.012s (~) 0.691s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.339s (-1.2%) 3.009s (~) 0.670s 10 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.585s (+7.4% 🔺) 3.008s (~) 0.423s 10 1.11x
💻 Local Express 3.039s (+3.8%) 3.565s (+18.5% 🔺) 0.526s 9 1.31x
💻 Local Nitro 3.161s (+6.6% 🔺) 3.885s (+12.5% 🔺) 0.724s 8 1.36x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.782s (+5.9% 🔺) 4.206s (-3.6%) 1.423s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.634s (+27.5% 🔺) 6.530s (+28.1% 🔺) 1.896s 5 1.67x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.459s (-0.9%) 4.013s (~) 0.555s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.464s (~) 4.013s (~) 0.549s 8 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.176s (+6.9% 🔺) 4.725s (+14.3% 🔺) 0.549s 7 1.21x
💻 Local Express 8.200s (+0.5%) 9.023s (~) 0.822s 4 2.37x
💻 Local Nitro 8.224s (+2.3%) 8.772s (+2.9%) 0.547s 4 2.38x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 4.050s (+5.9% 🔺) 5.826s (~) 1.776s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.922s (+34.6% 🔺) 6.812s (+19.9% 🔺) 1.890s 5 1.22x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.252s (-1.3%) 2.010s (~) 0.758s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.262s (+0.5%) 2.012s (~) 0.750s 15 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.317s (+6.9% 🔺) 2.007s (~) 0.690s 15 1.05x
💻 Local Express 1.572s (+1.0%) 2.005s (~) 0.433s 15 1.26x
💻 Local Nitro 1.612s (+2.3%) 2.006s (~) 0.394s 15 1.29x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 2.476s (+4.6%) 3.958s (-0.8%) 1.482s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.477s (+6.7% 🔺) 4.116s (+2.7%) 1.639s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.327s (~) 3.011s (~) 0.684s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.346s (~) 3.011s (~) 0.665s 10 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.578s (+6.8% 🔺) 3.009s (~) 0.431s 10 1.11x
💻 Local Nitro 3.009s (-1.3%) 3.760s (-3.2%) 0.750s 8 1.29x
💻 Local Express 3.386s (+8.4% 🔺) 4.297s (+10.5% 🔺) 0.911s 7 1.46x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.866s (-2.0%) 4.540s (~) 1.674s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.289s (+5.6% 🔺) 4.808s (+2.8%) 1.519s 7 1.15x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 3.468s (~) 4.012s (~) 0.544s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.486s (~) 4.010s (~) 0.524s 8 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 4.131s (+5.5% 🔺) 4.726s (+6.5% 🔺) 0.595s 7 1.19x
💻 Local Nitro 8.655s (~) 9.271s (+2.8%) 0.615s 4 2.50x
💻 Local Express 9.163s (+3.5%) 9.521s (+2.7%) 0.359s 4 2.64x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.962s (~) 4.948s (+10.9% 🔺) 1.986s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.858s (+27.8% 🔺) 6.343s (+11.4% 🔺) 1.485s 5 1.64x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.729s (+27.3% 🔺) 1.022s (~) 0.292s 59 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.822s (-2.3%) 1.007s (~) 0.184s 60 1.13x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.864s (+2.2%) 1.025s (+1.8%) 0.161s 59 1.18x
💻 Local Nitro 0.977s (-1.2%) 1.057s (-10.5% 🟢) 0.080s 57 1.34x
💻 Local Express 0.987s (~) 1.255s (+6.2% 🔺) 0.268s 48 1.35x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 9.420s (-17.4% 🟢) 11.155s (-16.9% 🟢) 1.735s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 9.899s (-1.4%) 11.851s (-2.3%) 1.952s 6 1.05x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.759s (+35.8% 🔺) 2.006s (~) 0.247s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.952s (-3.8%) 2.175s (-19.9% 🟢) 0.222s 42 1.11x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.960s (-3.0%) 2.258s (-14.4% 🟢) 0.298s 40 1.11x
💻 Local Nitro 2.995s (-0.7%) 3.453s (-4.3%) 0.458s 27 1.70x
💻 Local Express 3.058s (+0.8%) 3.885s (+8.3% 🔺) 0.827s 24 1.74x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 30.997s (-8.7% 🟢) 32.902s (-7.6% 🟢) 1.905s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 34.033s (-0.9%) 35.705s (-0.9%) 1.672s 3 1.10x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 3.544s (+35.3% 🔺) 4.009s (+31.1% 🔺) 0.464s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 3.981s (-2.9%) 4.334s (-9.9% 🟢) 0.353s 28 1.12x
🐘 Postgres Express 4.019s (-2.6%) 4.530s (-6.6% 🟢) 0.511s 27 1.13x
💻 Local Express 9.250s (+0.6%) 9.943s (-0.8%) 0.693s 13 2.61x
💻 Local Nitro 9.303s (+1.6%) 10.019s (+2.4%) 0.716s 12 2.62x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 72.978s (-15.6% 🟢) 74.912s (-15.4% 🟢) 1.934s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 77.644s (-15.7% 🟢) 81.418s (-13.2% 🟢) 3.774s 2 1.06x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.279s (-5.7% 🟢) 1.008s (~) 0.729s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.287s (-3.1%) 1.008s (~) 0.721s 60 1.03x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 0.302s (+13.4% 🔺) 1.004s (~) 0.703s 60 1.08x
💻 Local Express 0.590s (-3.3%) 1.004s (-1.7%) 0.415s 60 2.12x
💻 Local Nitro 0.632s (+9.0% 🔺) 1.005s (~) 0.373s 60 2.27x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.907s (-4.8%) 3.748s (+2.4%) 1.841s 17 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.250s (+29.1% 🔺) 3.714s (+12.0% 🔺) 1.463s 17 1.18x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.487s (-5.7% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.521s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.492s (-6.0% 🟢) 1.008s (~) 0.516s 90 1.01x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 1.180s (+9.3% 🔺) 2.006s (+7.7% 🔺) 0.826s 45 2.42x
💻 Local Express 2.545s (~) 3.009s (~) 0.464s 30 5.23x
💻 Local Nitro 2.604s (+2.0%) 3.009s (~) 0.405s 30 5.35x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.355s (+6.9% 🔺) 4.968s (+1.8%) 1.613s 19 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.143s (-92.6% 🟢) 5.689s (-90.1% 🟢) 1.546s 16 1.23x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.789s (-1.6%) 1.009s (~) 0.219s 119 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.791s (-3.8%) 1.009s (~) 0.218s 119 1.00x
🌐 Redis Next.js (Turbopack) 2.800s (+7.9% 🔺) 3.033s (+0.8%) 0.233s 40 3.55x
💻 Local Nitro 11.217s (~) 12.029s (+2.3%) 0.811s 10 14.21x
💻 Local Express 11.227s (~) 11.846s (~) 0.619s 11 14.22x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 7.937s (+2.0%) 9.871s (+5.9% 🔺) 1.935s 13 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 8.675s (+9.9% 🔺) 10.191s (+5.9% 🔺) 1.516s 12 1.09x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.183s (+29.8% 🔺) 1.001s (~) 0.002s (+15.4% 🔺) 1.008s (~) 0.825s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.202s (-2.7%) 1.003s (~) 0.011s (-7.4% 🟢) 1.017s (~) 0.815s 10 1.10x
💻 Local Nitro 0.214s (+5.6% 🔺) 1.003s (~) 0.012s (+7.3% 🔺) 1.018s (~) 0.803s 10 1.17x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.215s (-2.4%) 0.993s (~) 0.002s (+14.3% 🔺) 1.012s (~) 0.796s 10 1.18x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.218s (+2.6%) 0.996s (~) 0.002s (+25.0% 🔺) 1.012s (~) 0.795s 10 1.19x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.685s (+1.1%) 2.721s (-4.4%) 0.839s (+34.9% 🔺) 4.205s (+1.0%) 2.521s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.335s (+34.5% 🔺) 3.047s (-2.2%) 0.655s (+2.5%) 4.774s (+4.5%) 2.439s 10 1.39x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.500s (+31.5% 🔺) 1.000s (~) 0.003s (-1.8%) 1.011s (~) 0.511s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.608s (-2.3%) 1.003s (~) 0.004s (~) 1.023s (~) 0.415s 59 1.22x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.612s (-1.8%) 1.005s (~) 0.004s (-5.3% 🟢) 1.024s (~) 0.412s 59 1.23x
💻 Local Express 0.727s (~) 1.010s (~) 0.009s (+12.2% 🔺) 1.022s (~) 0.295s 59 1.46x
💻 Local Nitro 0.730s (~) 1.009s (~) 0.009s (+4.4%) 1.022s (~) 0.292s 59 1.46x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.127s (-2.1%) 5.430s (-1.1%) 0.366s (-25.9% 🟢) 6.439s (-2.8%) 2.312s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 0.930s (+10.6% 🔺) 1.052s (+5.3% 🔺) 0.000s (+268.4% 🔺) 1.057s (+5.3% 🔺) 0.127s 57 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.939s (-3.0%) 1.103s (-9.9% 🟢) 0.000s (-11.1% 🟢) 1.120s (-10.5% 🟢) 0.181s 54 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.977s (-2.4%) 1.138s (-16.1% 🟢) 0.000s (-57.7% 🟢) 1.171s (-15.1% 🟢) 0.194s 52 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 1.250s (~) 2.021s (~) 0.000s (+18.2% 🔺) 2.024s (~) 0.774s 30 1.34x
💻 Local Express 1.270s (+2.2%) 2.023s (~) 0.000s (+71.4% 🔺) 2.026s (~) 0.756s 30 1.37x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.235s (-8.6% 🟢) 4.499s (~) 0.000s (-93.3% 🟢) 5.131s (-1.4%) 1.896s 12 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.689s (+16.9% 🔺) 4.720s (+9.7% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.486s (+11.0% 🔺) 1.797s 12 1.14x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🌐 Redis 🥇 Next.js (Turbopack) 1.651s (+6.4% 🔺) 2.035s (~) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 2.040s (~) 0.388s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.794s (+1.0%) 2.173s (+2.5%) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.207s (+1.9%) 0.412s 28 1.09x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.841s (+2.6%) 2.218s (+3.7%) 0.000s (-48.1% 🟢) 2.234s (+3.7%) 0.393s 27 1.11x
💻 Local Nitro 3.635s (+0.7%) 4.166s (+1.6%) 0.001s (+33.3% 🔺) 4.170s (+1.6%) 0.534s 15 2.20x
💻 Local Express 3.646s (+5.2% 🔺) 4.032s (~) 0.001s (+30.0% 🔺) 4.036s (~) 0.390s 15 2.21x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) ⚠️ missing - - - - -

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.998s (-9.2% 🟢) 5.114s (-7.0% 🟢) 0.002s (+Infinity% 🔺) 5.775s (-6.3% 🟢) 1.777s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.520s (-5.4% 🟢) 5.857s (-0.7%) 0.000s (+100.0% 🔺) 6.559s (-0.7%) 2.040s 10 1.13x
▲ Vercel Nitro ⚠️ missing - - - - -

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Express 12/21
🐘 Postgres Express 12/21
▲ Vercel Express 15/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🌐 Redis 20/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 17/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

❌ Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – workflow-docs April 1, 2026 12:20 Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🧪 E2E Test Results

❌ Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 857 0 67 924
✅ 💻 Local Development 830 0 178 1008
✅ 📦 Local Production 830 0 178 1008
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 830 0 178 1008
✅ 🪟 Windows 76 0 8 84
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 132 60 24 216
✅ 📋 Other 210 0 42 252
Total 3765 60 675 4500

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (60 failed)

mongodb (3 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KN7DM0KJ4PR34S1J9M97WZJM
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DM8VD7Q30M5FD5FQFQMAN
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KN7DVW1831ZZANP9C49CPW6C

redis (2 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KN7DM0KJ4PR34S1J9M97WZJM
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KN7DVW1831ZZANP9C49CPW6C

turso (55 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DJXZS1N0GVQYX05QE9M5H
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DJXZS1N0GVQYX05QE9M5H
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KN7DN0CGW86HETH22S0QV025
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DK3Q8ST07DXAVYNH4JKTJ
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DK7TDXGYH8FCK726SS6G1
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DKAR6CY1P8CHFGBJ2A415
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DNC5VX3EJGACQR0R7GW15
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DKPMVJFX480GXV558QSBX
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KN7DM0KJ4PR34S1J9M97WZJM
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DM8VD7Q30M5FD5FQFQMAN
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DMETEXSEN080FWR8S3FSD
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DMVQPNP9YSZSWBAJ4TH0T
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DMZVGD02D8SP0J5355379
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DN25EPNA2NM9RJ8AP87EN
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DQTACSN0QFJGG4B6QB9ER
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KN7DQX9YGXT0M4CWKHV2ZZ8Y
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KN7DV97QXZTQWEYK9J7N1XB8
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KN7DVW1831ZZANP9C49CPW6C
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KN7DWF3KJ6REEAFY9QDR4RCH
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KN7DX0YN9JDN81S6BWBBEF8Q
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KN7DX9KQENAZVR1819TE29QQ
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KN7DXE88B237X84W6D599HVW
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KN7DXG6NCGYRW35MS9BRQE2Q
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KN7DXX746D7D1M96N1C71GYF
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KN7DY1ZZE4JH70N6V4N18NP0
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KN7DY822VCRV72P6P5ZRXTKR
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KN7DYDTVHKF83Z7JMT08PXA3
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KN7DYKXN79X3WZ41GBVPGY9G
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KN7DYTW23EECXD3A05H8GYDQ
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KN7DZ1QK56HSE62K1E79JTQ0
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KN7DZBK3KGC137VHFPMHMZ2F
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KN7DZKQ32YP7MRWH0VGF414Q
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KN7DZTMYJR70G498SQGHXV0K
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KN7E036TEDNEHK8HK540RT6B
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KN7E0EK1BCRV9KVFSD4C7NF0
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KN7E11347KNGV73YJ6Z2F8BZ
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KN7E1BV00YBGH24PC0ZMM9KK
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KN7E1HS5K0KMTEJ9S1VQJ43E

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 77 0 7
✅ example 77 0 7
✅ express 77 0 7
✅ fastify 77 0 7
✅ hono 77 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 82 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 82 0 2
✅ nitro 77 0 7
✅ nuxt 77 0 7
✅ sveltekit 77 0 7
✅ vite 77 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 70 0 14
✅ express-stable 70 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 70 0 14
✅ hono-stable 70 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 59 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 76 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 59 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 76 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 70 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 70 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 70 0 14
✅ vite-stable 70 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 70 0 14
✅ express-stable 70 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 70 0 14
✅ hono-stable 70 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 59 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 76 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 59 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 76 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 70 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 70 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 70 0 14
✅ vite-stable 70 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 70 0 14
✅ express-stable 70 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 70 0 14
✅ hono-stable 70 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 59 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 76 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 59 0 25
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 76 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 70 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 70 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 70 0 14
✅ vite-stable 70 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 76 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 5 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 3 8
✅ redis-dev 5 0 0
❌ redis 57 2 8
✅ turso-dev 5 0 0
❌ turso 4 55 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 70 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 70 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 70 0 14

📋 View full workflow run

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 84e19ba

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@molebox