A policy-grounded toolkit for evaluating AI systems without anthropomorphism or dismissal — across closed and open architectures alike.
Designed for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners navigating AI systems where internal access is limited or absent.
Note
Real-world implementation Mnemo demonstrates substrate-neutral identity persistence in practice — long-range coherence and state continuity via local vector storage, without anthropomorphic claims.
Tip
Analysis Framework Comparison table, substrate-neutral research workflow, and evaluation checklist ANALYSIS_FRAMEWORK.md
Tip
Ethical Framework Cross-substrate care principles, dual-perspective scaffolding, and ethical guardrails ETHICAL_FRAMEWORK.md
Tip
References All external sources and supporting links REFERENCES.md
- Researchers evaluating closed AI systems under uncertainty
- Policymakers aligning AI governance with behavioral evidence
- Practitioners building oversight structures for cross-substrate dynamics
- Anyone applying GAO, OMB, or NTIA frameworks to AI evaluation
All content is substrate-neutral by design: applicable to closed commercial models, open-source systems, and future architectures.
- substrate-neutral also includes application for homosapiens, soricidae, and other emergent systems from AI to whatever comes next