Skip to content

fix(supervisor): bump turbo to fix docker build#4052

Merged
carderne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/supervisor-docker
Jun 26, 2026
Merged

fix(supervisor): bump turbo to fix docker build#4052
carderne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/supervisor-docker

Conversation

@carderne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The supervisor image build has been failing since @trigger.dev/core gained
an ai peer dependency. turbo prune (2.5.4) generates a pruned lockfile
that references the ai@6.0.116(zod@3.25.76) snapshot without including the
entry itself, which causes pnpm fetch --frozen-lockfile to abort.

Bumping to 2.10.0 fixes the pnpm v9 peer dep snapshot pruning. Updated both
Containerfiles for consistency.

Example failure here:
https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/actions/runs/28225353375/job/83618124564

Broken since:
c06005b

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: efca1da

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 94b0403a-732b-4a24-a8ef-06655049d5ff

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df78ef9 and efca1da.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/supervisor/Containerfile
  • docker/Dockerfile
📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (2)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/supervisor/Containerfile (1)

8-8: LGTM!

docker/Dockerfile (1)

11-11: LGTM!


Walkthrough

The PR updates the Turbo prune command version in apps/supervisor/Containerfile and docker/Dockerfile from 2.5.4 to 2.10.0. The prune arguments and build stages remain unchanged.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description explains the bug and fix, but it omits most required template sections like Closes #, Testing, Changelog, and Screenshots. Fill in the template sections: add the issue reference, checklist items, testing steps, a short changelog entry, and screenshots or mark them N/A.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title is concise and accurately summarizes the main change: bumping Turbo to fix Docker builds.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/supervisor-docker

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@carderne carderne requested a review from ericallam June 26, 2026 09:14
@carderne carderne marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2026 09:14
@carderne carderne merged commit 12352a0 into main Jun 26, 2026
23 checks passed
@carderne carderne deleted the fix/supervisor-docker branch June 26, 2026 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants