Skip to content

Conversation

@thedaviddias
Copy link
Owner

@thedaviddias thedaviddias commented Jan 5, 2026

This PR adds CEIS-IT to the llms.txt hub.

Submitted by: extern

Website: https://ceis-it.de/
llms.txt: https://ceis-it.de/llms.txt

Category: other


This PR was created via admin token for a user without GitHub repository access.

Please review and merge if appropriate.


Note

Adds a new website listing for CEIS-IT.

  • New packages/content/data/websites/ceis-it-llms-txt.mdx with CEIS-IT metadata (name, description, website, llmsUrl, category, publishedAt) and a brief description

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit c063123. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new listing entry with metadata and descriptive content.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 5, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
llms-txt-hub Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 5, 2026 2:21pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Walkthrough

A new MDX file is added to the websites directory containing listing metadata and descriptive content for a website entry. The file includes front matter with name, description, URLs, category, and publication date fields, followed by a brief body section.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New website listing
packages/content/data/websites/ceis-it-llms-txt.mdx
New MDX content file with front matter metadata (name, description, website, llmsUrl, llmsFullUrl, category, publishedAt) and body content defining a website listing entry

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: adding CEIS-IT to the llms.txt hub. It is concise, specific, and accurately reflects the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a28c655 and c063123.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/content/data/websites/ceis-it-llms-txt.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🔍 Remote MCP Linear

Based on my search of the available Linear tools, I found relevant context about the llms.txt hub project. Here's what I discovered:

Project Context

The llms.txt hub project is an active initiative tracked in Linear.

  • Status: In Progress (started February 24, 2025)
  • Lead: David Dias
  • Scope: Building a hub for websites with llms.txt files

Similar Submissions Pattern

The search revealed that adding new website entries to the llms.txt hub is an ongoing pattern of work. Recent related issues include:

  • Adding Vercel's llms.txt (DDD-1133) - marked Done
  • Adding link to standard llms.txt documentation (DDD-1126) - marked Done
  • Adding upsun.com (DDD-1134) - in Todo state

Key Observations for Your Review

  1. Consistent workflow: The project follows a clear pattern of adding individual website listings with standardized metadata (name, description, website URL, llms.txt URL, category, publication date).

  2. External submissions: The PR notes it was created via admin token for a user without direct repository access, which aligns with this being a community-contributed submission to the hub.

  3. Verification checklist: Since this follows the established pattern, your review should verify:

    • The website (https://ceis-it.de/) has a valid llms.txt file accessible at https://ceis-it.de/llms.txt
    • The MDX front matter metadata is correctly formatted and complete
    • The category classification ("other") is appropriate for this submission
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Validate
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/content/data/websites/ceis-it-llms-txt.mdx (3)

1-9: Verify that the referenced URLs are accessible before merging.

Please ensure that both the website and llms.txt file are accessible and properly formatted:

  1. Website URL (line 4): https://ceis-it.de/ — confirm it's responsive and contains the described IT services.
  2. llmsUrl (line 5): https://ceis-it.de/llms.txt — verify this file exists and is accessible at the root of the domain, following the llms.txt standard which proposes adding a /llms.txt markdown file to websites to provide LLM-friendly content.
  3. llmsFullUrl (line 6): This field is left empty. Clarify whether this is intentional (e.g., when a full-text version doesn't exist) or if it should be populated.

2-8: Verify metadata format consistency with other entries.

The front matter metadata (lines 2–8) uses a consistent structure. Please confirm that:

  • The date format (publishedAt: '2026-01-05') matches the ISO 8601 format used in other entries.
  • The category classification 'other' is appropriate for an IT service/computer repair shop, or if a more specific category (e.g., 'service', 'technology') should be used.

11-13: Content duplication between front matter and body.

The description in the front matter (line 3) is identical to the body content (line 13). While this may be intentional, verify that this pattern is consistent with other website entries in the hub. If descriptions vary, consider whether the body should provide additional context or differentiation.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants