Add label existence check to umxModify#260
Add label existence check to umxModify#260google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
Added a check in `umxModify` to verify if the labels provided in the `update` argument exist in the model parameters. If labels are missing, the function now stops with an informative error message. Added logic to suggest reversed labels for "with" paths (e.g. suggesting "b_with_a" if "a_with_b" is missing but "b_with_a" exists).
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Implemented label validation in
umxModifyto prevent runtime errors when updating model parameters. The function now checks if the specified labels exist in the model. If not, it provides a descriptive error message and suggests reversed labels for covariance paths if applicable.PR created automatically by Jules for task 10521286875215682924 started by @tbates