Skip to content

Create dp1.java - #2018

Open
Praniksha123 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
Praniksha123:master
Open

Create dp1.java#2018
Praniksha123 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
Praniksha123:master

Conversation

@Praniksha123

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Coin Change (dp1.java)

Great work! Your solution correctly solves the Coin Change problem using bottom-up dynamic programming. Here are some observations:

Strengths:

  1. Your DP approach is correct and handles all edge cases properly
  2. The use of amount+1 as a sentinel value is a clever way to handle the impossible case
  3. The recurrence relation is correctly implemented
  4. Your solution is more efficient than the reference solution (O(n*m) vs O(2^(m+n)))

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Space Optimization: Your solution uses O(n*m) space. You can optimize this to O(m) space using a 1D DP array:

    int[] dp = new int[amount + 1];
    Arrays.fill(dp, amount + 1);
    dp[0] = 0;
    for (int coin : coins) {
        for (int j = coin; j <= amount; j++) {
            dp[j] = Math.min(dp[j], dp[j - coin] + 1);
        }
    }
    return dp[amount] > amount ? -1 : dp[amount];
  2. Code Organization: The file contains two unrelated solutions (Coin Change and House Robber). Consider separating them into different files for better organization.

  3. Variable Naming: Consider using more descriptive variable names like numCoins instead of n and targetAmount instead of m for better readability.

Overall, your solution is correct and efficient. The main improvement would be the space optimization.

VERDICT: PASS


House Robber

Excellent work! Your solution demonstrates a strong understanding of dynamic programming and space optimization. Here are some specific points:

Strengths:

  1. Optimal Space Complexity: By using only two variables instead of a DP array, you've achieved O(1) space complexity, which is the best possible for this problem.
  2. Clean Implementation: The code is concise and easy to follow.
  3. Proper Base Case Handling: You correctly handle the edge case of a single house.
  4. Better than Reference: Your solution is asymptotically better than the reference solution in both time and space.

Areas for Improvement:

  1. File Organization: The file contains two separate solutions (coinChange and rob). While this isn't incorrect, it's better practice to have one solution per file/class for clarity.
  2. Variable Naming: Consider using more descriptive names like prevMax and currMax instead of prev and curr for better readability.
  3. Comments: Adding brief comments explaining the DP recurrence would help others understand your approach.

Overall: This is a textbook optimal solution that demonstrates mastery of the problem. Well done!

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants