docs: fix broken link

[Om-A-osc]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: na
• task: lint_repl_help status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src status: na
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---
  Resolves #0.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Removes a broken link and replaces it with a working link to the Julia style guide.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" above, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

N/A — no AI assistance was used for this PR.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

   - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

• The developer's certificate of origin
• Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

[SuYaSh-PaThAk04]

@Om-A-osc Please make sure you read the contribution guidelines and you shall pass all the checks for a PR to be approved .

[Om-A-osc]

@SuYaSh-PaThAk04 is anything wrong in the pr ?

[SuYaSh-PaThAk04]

@SuYaSh-PaThAk04 is anything wrong in the pr ?

You shall follow the PR format and also fill the TODOs

[Om-A-osc]

@SuYaSh-PaThAk04 sorry for the incorrect PR format earlier, I’ve fixed it now. I’ve also updated the PR with the required details. Could you please review the latest changes and let me know if anything else needs to be adjusted, or merge it if everything looks good?

[SuYaSh-PaThAk04]

@SuYaSh-PaThAk04 sorry for the incorrect PR format earlier, I’ve fixed it now. I’ve also updated the PR with the required details. Could you please review the latest changes and let me know if anything else needs to be adjusted, or merge it if everything looks good?

Still you didn't mentioned that which issue It fixes there is no mention of any issue in this PR . Also the Format is not correct now also

[SuYaSh-PaThAk04]

Please specify the issue that it fixes

[Om-A-osc]

@SuYaSh-PaThAk04 There are no related issues. I was going through julia style guide and found that link was broken. So I thought lets fix it. It is a small thing. Should I raise a issue for this and then link a pr to it ?