Skip to content

Add GraalVM native-image question & answer to FAQ#2323

Open
msgilligan wants to merge 1 commit intospockframework:masterfrom
msgilligan:msgilligan/faq-add-graalvm
Open

Add GraalVM native-image question & answer to FAQ#2323
msgilligan wants to merge 1 commit intospockframework:masterfrom
msgilligan:msgilligan/faq-add-graalvm

Conversation

@msgilligan
Copy link
Contributor

@msgilligan msgilligan commented Mar 15, 2026

This PR was suggested by @Vampire in Issue #2169.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added FAQ entry explaining that Spock tests are incompatible with GraalVM native-image due to their reliance on dynamic Groovy/JVM features.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 15, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f6b39e9a-1d98-49c1-a9fc-518ff7954135

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c6342c and 15432e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/faq.adoc

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new FAQ entry was added explaining that Spock tests cannot be compiled and run with GraalVM native-image due to their dependency on dynamic Groovy/JVM features, with a reference to Issue #2169.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
docs/faq.adoc
Added new FAQ entry clarifying incompatibility between Spock tests and GraalVM native-image, referencing dynamic language requirements.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A question was asked, so clear and so true,
About Spock and GraalVM—what tests cannot do,
Dynamic Groovy magic needs freedom to dance,
Native-image binaries just won't give it a chance! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change—adding a GraalVM native-image Q&A entry to the FAQ documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Tip

CodeRabbit can use Trivy to scan for security misconfigurations and secrets in Infrastructure as Code files.

Add a .trivyignore file to your project to customize which findings Trivy reports.

@greptile-apps
Copy link

greptile-apps bot commented Mar 15, 2026

Greptile Summary

Adds a new FAQ entry to docs/faq.adoc explaining that Spock tests cannot be compiled and run with GraalVM native-image due to their reliance on dynamic Groovy/JVM features. The entry links to Issue #2169 for further details.

  • Adds one new Q&A section to the FAQ documentation
  • Follows existing AsciiDoc formatting conventions in the file
  • No code changes; documentation-only PR

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge — it is a minimal, documentation-only change with no code impact.
  • The PR adds 5 lines of documentation to an existing FAQ file. The AsciiDoc syntax is correct and consistent with the rest of the file. There are no code changes, no logic changes, and no risk of regressions.
  • No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
docs/faq.adoc Adds a new FAQ entry clarifying that Spock tests are not compatible with GraalVM native-image, with a link to the relevant GitHub issue. No issues found.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A["docs/faq.adoc"] --> B["Existing FAQ entries"]
    A --> C["New: GraalVM native-image Q&A"]
    C --> D["Links to Issue #2169"]
    B --> E["Optional dependencies"]
    B --> F["ByteBuddy vs CGLIB"]
Loading

Last reviewed commit: 15432e9

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.16%. Comparing base (9c6342c) to head (15432e9).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2323      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     82.16%   82.16%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     4822     4821       -1     
============================================
  Files           472      472              
  Lines         15036    15036              
  Branches       1905     1905              
============================================
- Hits          12355    12354       -1     
  Misses         1989     1989              
- Partials        692      693       +1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant