Skip to content

Update Overview Community Management Guide.mdx#513

Draft
NFTDreww wants to merge 3 commits into
security-alliance:developfrom
NFTDreww:fw_community_mgmt
Draft

Update Overview Community Management Guide.mdx#513
NFTDreww wants to merge 3 commits into
security-alliance:developfrom
NFTDreww:fw_community_mgmt

Conversation

@NFTDreww
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@NFTDreww NFTDreww commented Jun 2, 2026

I have updated the overall update overview to be more inline with the feedback given over the past few weeks, which were:

  1. Reframe the intro as a wayfinding statement. Instead of opening with a content summary, open with a one- or two-sentence orientation about what community security covers and where to go. Something like: "Community Management security spans several disciplines — each with its own dedicated Framework. Use this page to find the right one."

  2. Convert the best practices section into a visual index. Each of the four sections (2FA/passwords, phishing, OpSec, emergency response) already has a corresponding Framework, so we can turn them into explicit cards or a linked table with the topic, a single descriptive sentence, and the link. This keeps the content without making it feel like a dead end.

  3. Cut the inline detail that lives somewhere else. For example, TOTP configuration advice, the password manager separation rule, and the DM-first policy all belong in the destination frameworks, not here. Keeping it here creates both a maintenance burden for your team and dilutes the "go there for more" message.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Therefore I was able to make the community manage guides more of the why, what, and how/where? Explaining this information and then leading into the actual frameworks for each that ALL needs to be taken into consideration when talking about community management and it's subsequent guides/frameworks.

This included a complete reformat of this page, that I think addresses all feedback and has a cleaner flow to providing the north star for this section.

Frameworks PR Checklist

Thank you for contributing to the Security Frameworks! Before you open a PR, make sure to read information for contributors and take a look at the following checklist:

  • Describe your changes, substitute this text with the information
  • If you are touching an existing piece of content, tag current contributors from the attribution list
  • If there is a steward for that framework, ask the steward to review it
  • If you're modifying the general outline, make sure to update it in the vocs.config.ts adding the dev: true parameter
  • If you need feedback for your content from the wider community, share the PR in our Discord
  • Review changes to ensure there are no typos; see instructions below.

NFTDreww added 3 commits June 2, 2026 10:28
I have updated the overall update overview to be more inline with the feedback given over the past few weeks, which were:

1) Reframe the intro as a wayfinding statement. Instead of opening with a content summary, open with a one- or two-sentence orientation about what community security covers and where to go. Something like: "Community Management security spans several disciplines — each with its own dedicated Framework. Use this page to find the right one."

2) Convert the best practices section into a visual index. Each of the four sections (2FA/passwords, phishing, OpSec, emergency response) already has a corresponding Framework, so we can turn them into explicit cards or a linked table with the topic, a single descriptive sentence, and the link. This keeps the content without making it feel like a dead end.

3) Cut the inline detail that lives somewhere else. For example, TOTP configuration advice, the password manager separation rule, and the DM-first policy all belong in the destination frameworks, not here. Keeping it here creates both a maintenance burden for your team and dilutes the "go there for more" message.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore I was able to make the community manage guides more of the why, what, and how/where? Explaining this information and then leading into the actual frameworks for each that ALL needs to be taken into consideration when talking about community management and it's subsequent guides/frameworks.

This included a complete reformat of this page, that I think addresses all feedback and has a cleaner flow to providing the north star for this section.
I have updated the overall update overview to be more inline with the feedback given over the past few weeks, which were:

Reframe the intro as a wayfinding statement. Instead of opening with a content summary, open with a one- or two-sentence orientation about what community security covers and where to go. Something like: "Community Management security spans several disciplines — each with its own dedicated Framework. Use this page to find the right one."

Convert the best practices section into a visual index. Each of the four sections (2FA/passwords, phishing, OpSec, emergency response) already has a corresponding Framework, so we can turn them into explicit cards or a linked table with the topic, a single descriptive sentence, and the link. This keeps the content without making it feel like a dead end.

Cut the inline detail that lives somewhere else. For example, TOTP configuration advice, the password manager separation rule, and the DM-first policy all belong in the destination frameworks, not here. Keeping it here creates both a maintenance burden for your team and dilutes the "go there for more" message.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Therefore I was able to make the community manage guides more of the why, what, and how/where? Explaining this information and then leading into the actual frameworks for each that ALL needs to be taken into consideration when talking about community management and it's subsequent guides/frameworks.

This included a complete reformat of this page, that I think addresses all feedback and has a cleaner flow to providing the north star for this section.
I have updated the overall update overview to be more inline with the feedback given over the past few weeks, which were:

Reframe the intro as a wayfinding statement. Instead of opening with a content summary, open with a one- or two-sentence orientation about what community security covers and where to go. Something like: "Community Management security spans several disciplines — each with its own dedicated Framework. Use this page to find the right one."

Convert the best practices section into a visual index. Each of the four sections (2FA/passwords, phishing, OpSec, emergency response) already has a corresponding Framework, so we can turn them into explicit cards or a linked table with the topic, a single descriptive sentence, and the link. This keeps the content without making it feel like a dead end.

Cut the inline detail that lives somewhere else. For example, TOTP configuration advice, the password manager separation rule, and the DM-first policy all belong in the destination frameworks, not here. Keeping it here creates both a maintenance burden for your team and dilutes the "go there for more" message.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Therefore I was able to make the community manage guides more of the why, what, and how/where? Explaining this information and then leading into the actual frameworks for each that ALL needs to be taken into consideration when talking about community management and it's subsequent guides/frameworks.

This included a complete reformat of this page, that I think addresses all feedback and has a cleaner flow to providing the north star for this section.
@NFTDreww NFTDreww changed the title Update overview.mdx Update Overview Community Management Guide.mdx Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant