core: add try_next_code_point{,_reverse} internal functions - #161756
Draft
pacak wants to merge 7 commits into
Draft
core: add try_next_code_point{,_reverse} internal functions#161756pacak wants to merge 7 commits into
pacak wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
Right now things are undertested and underspecified. Some of the library code would get in a loop if searcher starts returning empty rejects. And there's no tests for backwards multi byte char matchers. Pull request I'm reviving had a problem implementing that, so making sure it's tested before the actual code lands. Right now it is possible to break both tests (and user code) without breaking anything else in the test suite I think.
Add a Haystack trait describing something that can be searched in and make core::str::Pattern (and related types) generic on that trait. This will allow Pattern to be used for types other than str (most notably OsStr). This somewhat follows the Pattern API 2.0 design. While that design is apparently abandoned (?), it is somewhat helpful when going for patterns on OsStr, so I’m going with it unless someone tells me otherwise. ;) For now leave Pattern, Haystack et al in core::str::pattern. Since they are no longer str-specific, I’ll move them to core::pattern in future commit. This one leaves them in place to make the diff smaller. @pacak: I moved some (or all new) of the `P: Pattern<&'a str> constraints into where clause to keep things narrower: ``` pub fn foo<'a, P: Pattern<&'a str>>(&'a self, pat: P, ...) ... ``` to ``` pub fn replacen<'a, P>(&'a self, pat: P, ...) ... where P: Pattern<&'a str>, ``` Original code had indices in Haystack abstracted as an associated type Cursor. Replaced with usize - Cursor adds noise with not much value. Changed wording in 2-3 places - for example Searcher is generic over a few types so it makes more sense to talk about split points in general with utf8 split points as an example for `&str`.
Pattern is no longer str-specific, so move it from core::str::pattern module to a new core::pattern module. This introduces no changes in behaviour or implementation. Just moves stuff around and adjusts documentation.
Introduce core::pattern::Split and core::pattern::SplitN internal types which can be used to implement iterators splitting haystack into parts. Convert str’s Split-family of iterators to use them. In the future, more haystacks will use those internal types. Co-authored-by: Peter Jaszkowiak <p.jaszkow@gmail.com> @pacak: Fixed some typos, added a few `#[inline]`. Since there's no `H::Cursor` - I had to add `ctx: PhantomData<H>`.
This reverts commit 85cf233ced0d0fe02734c8a83b6d79ccc5432d06. Gone for now, I'll reimplement it later in str_bytes.rs, will confirm with the benchmarks included that the optimization still applies
Introduce core::pattern::EmptyNeedleSearcher internal type which implements logic for matching an empty pattern against a haystack. Convert core::str::pattern::StrSearcher to use it. In future more implementations will take advantage of it. Also adapt and rework TwoWayStrategy into an internal SearchResult trait which abstracts differences between Searcher’s next, next_match and next_rejects methods. It makes it simpler to write a single generic method implementing optimised versions of all those calls. @pacak: - Fixed a few typos. - There's no H::Cursor parameter so code gets a bit simplified. - Added a test to assert how TwoWaySearcher runs with EmptyNeedleSearcher
@pacak: - made more things const fn - there was a (copy-paste?) error in try_finish_byte_sequence so I added a test that checks try_next_code_point(_reverse) with some values, including invalid ones. - reworded a few comments (passive voice, etc) Also different comments: since former is public and later is private due to historical reasons. > This is different than [`next_code_point`] in that it doesn't assume > This is different than `next_code_point_reverse` in that it doesn't assume
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
This was referenced Aug 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@pacak:
added a test that checks try_next_code_point(_reverse) with some
values, including invalid ones.
Also different comments: since former is public and later is private due
to historical reasons.
This PR is part of a stack containing 16 PRs:
main