Rollup of 6 pull requests#152934
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 14 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Feb 21, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Previously, `self.props.compile_flags.windows(2)` would return an empty iterator in the case where `self.props.compile_flags` was 1 or 0 length. This created incorrectness where tests like `tests/mir-opt/pre-codegen/copy_and_clone.rs` would pass when they should fail.
Same as 147495, just keeping it up-to-date.
…lignment from a vtable
…r=mati865 Tighten the `!range` bounds on alignments in vtables Right now we're only telling LLVM that they're non-zero, but alignments must be powers of two so can't be more than `isize::MAX+1`. And we actually never emit anything beyond LLVM's limit of 2²⁹, so outside of 16-bit targets the limit is that. (Pulled out from rust-lang#152867 which is starting to have too much in it.)
… r=jhpratt Stabilize `str_as_str` - Tracking issue: rust-lang#130366 - Needs FCP - `ByteStr` methods remain gated behind `bstr` feature gate (rust-lang#134915) Closes rust-lang#130366
Remove two more flaky assertions from `oneshot` tests These elapsed-time-upper-bound assertions are inherently flaky in CI, because CI runners will sometimes starve individual threads for a surprisingly long time, so the assertions can fail even if nothing went wrong. Similar changes for other flaky `oneshot` tests: - rust-lang#152145 - rust-lang#152648 Example flaky failure: - rust-lang#152747 (comment)
…al-sv-init, r=mati865
Error on attempt to construct scalable vector type
If you attempt to construct a scalable vector type rust will ICE.
E.g.:
```rust
#[rustc_scalable_vector(4)]
#[allow(non_camel_case_types)]
struct svint32_t(i32);
fn main() {
let foo = svint32_t(1);
// This will ICE
}
```
This PR adds a check that will emit an error if you attempt to use a SV constructor and a test to ensure it works.
…on-flag-check, r=clubby789,jieyouxu Improve runtest revision redundant cfg check While attempting to ingest rust-lang#148034 via ferrocene/ferrocene#2172 we noticed a test failure, as we add some `compile_flags` to tests. We saw a failure looking like this: ``` Testing stage1 with compiletest suite=mir-opt mode=mir-opt (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) running 2 tests 2026-02-20T20:21:28.846102Z ERROR compiletest::runtest: redundant cfg argument `copy` is already created by the revision [mir-opt] tests/mir-opt/pre-codegen/copy_and_clone.rs#COPY ... F . ``` While my Rust checkout passed: ``` Testing stage1 with compiletest suite=mir-opt mode=mir-opt (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) running 2 tests .. test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 381 filtered out; finished in 107.10ms ``` This caused me to add some debugging statements. Ferrocene: ``` 2026-02-20T21:05:39.808427Z ERROR compiletest::runtest: "copy": does ["--edition=2015", "--cfg=copy"] contain `"--cfg=copy"` or `["--cfg", "copy"]`? true 2026-02-20T21:05:39.808427Z ERROR compiletest::runtest: "clone": does ["--edition=2015"] contain `"--cfg=clone"` or `["--cfg", "clone"]`? false 2026-02-20T21:05:39.808435Z ERROR compiletest::runtest: redundant cfg argument `copy` is already created by the revision ``` Rust: ``` 2026-02-20T21:04:18.493158Z ERROR compiletest::runtest: "copy": does ["--cfg=copy"] contain `"--cfg=copy"` or `["--cfg", "copy"]`? false 2026-02-20T21:04:18.493158Z ERROR compiletest::runtest: "clone": does [] contain `"--cfg=clone"` or `["--cfg", "clone"]`? false ``` I noticed while reviewing the related functionality that there is a call to `.windows(2)` in the relevant check for redundant cfgs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/0376d43d443cba463a0b6a6ec9140ea17d7b7130/src/tools/compiletest/src/runtest.rs#L507-L511 Noting: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/0376d43d443cba463a0b6a6ec9140ea17d7b7130/library/core/src/slice/mod.rs#L1064-L1066 Because of this, the revision check was getting an empty iterator when `self.props.compile_flags` was length 0 or 1. This fix adjusts the check to handle such cases. I went ahead and fixed the relevant test (4b3cd9b) that was impacted by this. I do not suspect there are others, at least within the scope that Ferrocene tests, as we have not previously seen this failure.
…-ld, r=jieyouxu Update wasm-component-ld Same as rust-lang#147495, just keeping it up-to-date.
rustbot
added
A-compiletest
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Contributor
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2026
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #152929 (Tighten the `!range` bounds on alignments in vtables) - #151603 (Stabilize `str_as_str`) - #152878 (Remove two more flaky assertions from `oneshot` tests) - #152915 (Error on attempt to construct scalable vector type) - #152925 (Improve runtest revision redundant cfg check) - #152928 (Update wasm-component-ld)
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
💥 Test timed out after |
Member
Author
|
@bors retry |
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-bors
bot
added
merged-by-bors
Contributor
Collaborator
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 99246f4093 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Contributor
What is this?This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.Comparing 99246f4 (parent) -> 5fb2ff8 (this PR) Test differencesShow 88 test diffsStage 1
Stage 2
Additionally, 86 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy. Job group index
Test dashboardRun cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard 5fb2ff8611e5a4af4dc85977cfdecfbf3ffa6ade --output-dir test-dashboardAnd then open Job duration changes
How to interpret the job duration changes?Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance |
This was referenced Feb 21, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
!rangebounds on alignments in vtables #152929 (Tighten the!rangebounds on alignments in vtables)str_as_str#151603 (Stabilizestr_as_str)oneshottests #152878 (Remove two more flaky assertions fromoneshottests)r? @ghost
Create a similar rollup