Deduplicated float tests and unified in floats/mod.rs#148206
Deduplicated float tests and unified in floats/mod.rs#148206rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
|
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Any update @bjorn3 ? |
|
CI is still failing. |
ok let me fix . |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift cc @bjorn3 |
b802b19 to
abd73fd
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
| let inf: Float = Float::INFINITY; | ||
| let neg_inf: Float = Float::NEG_INFINITY; | ||
| assert_biteq!((10.0 as Float).log(10.0), 1.0); | ||
| assert_approx_eq!((2.3 as Float).log(3.5), 0.664858, Float::LOG_APPROX); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test here for f128 will fail because the precision is much higher, if you look at the original test, the expected value is much more precise than what you have written:
assert_approx_eq!(2.3f128.log(3.5), 0.66485771361478710036766645911922010272, TOL);When testing higher precision floats, you need much more precise expected values or the tests will fail, as they do now. In Miri, this is even more strict.
If you look at the source of f16 constants, they use much more digits after the decimal point than needed:
pub const PI: f16 = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288_f16;So you should probably do that as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay it makes sense . Thanks
|
Thank you for the final cleanup here. Until CI is fixed, |
|
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
Will finish this as soon as possible . A bit busy these days. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
0f27f23 to
507fb72
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test for 014baa1 failed: CI. Failed job:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
0b4eb72 to
c9850ea
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
c9850ea to
a82ad7f
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
a82ad7f to
b864796
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
New float tests in core are failing on clif with issues like the
following:
Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
"_coshf128", referenced from:
__RNvMNtCshY0fR2o0hOA_3std4f128C4f1284coshCs5TKtJxXQNGL_9coretests in coretests-e38519c0cc90db54.coretests.44b6247a565e10d1-cgu.10.rcgu.o
"_exp2f128", referenced from:
__RNvMNtCshY0fR2o0hOA_3std4f128C4f1284exp2Cs5TKtJxXQNGL_9coretests in coretests-e38519c0cc90db54.coretests.44b6247a565e10d1-cgu.10.rcgu.o
...
Disable f128 math unless the symbols are known to be available, which
for now is only glibc targets. This matches the LLVM backend.
b864796 to
8379475
Compare
|
@tgross35 If everything looks good you can rerun bors . I hope it passes this time . |
|
@bors try jobs=aarch64-apple,x86_64-mingw-1 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Deduplicated float tests and unified in floats/mod.rs try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's try again! Thanks for the updates.
@bors r+ rollup=iffy
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #148206 (Deduplicated float tests and unified in floats/mod.rs) - #150601 (support c-variadic functions in `rustc_const_eval`) - #152103 (Consider captures to be used by closures that unwind) - #152296 (Port `rust_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed` and `rustc_do_not_const_check` to the new attribute parser) - #152648 (Remove timing assertion from `oneshot::send_before_recv_timeout`) - #152686 (bootstrap: Inline the `is_tool` check for setting `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked`) Failed merges: - #152512 (core: Implement feature `float_exact_integer_constants`)
Rollup merge of #148206 - xonx4l:deduplicate-float-tests, r=tgross35 Deduplicated float tests and unified in floats/mod.rs In this PR Float tests are deduplicated and are unified in floats/mod.rs, as discussed in #141726. The moved float tests are: -> test_powf -> test_exp -> test_exp2 -> test_ln -> test_log_generic -> test_log2 -> test_log10 -> test_asinh -> test_acosh -> test_atanh -> test_gamma -> test_ln_gamma Closes: #141726
|
We’re always happy to help, and we appreciate the effort :) |
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#148206 (Deduplicated float tests and unified in floats/mod.rs) - rust-lang/rust#150601 (support c-variadic functions in `rustc_const_eval`) - rust-lang/rust#152103 (Consider captures to be used by closures that unwind) - rust-lang/rust#152296 (Port `rust_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed` and `rustc_do_not_const_check` to the new attribute parser) - rust-lang/rust#152648 (Remove timing assertion from `oneshot::send_before_recv_timeout`) - rust-lang/rust#152686 (bootstrap: Inline the `is_tool` check for setting `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked`) Failed merges: - rust-lang/rust#152512 (core: Implement feature `float_exact_integer_constants`)
In this PR Float tests are deduplicated and are unified in floats/mod.rs, as discussed in #141726.
The moved float tests are:
-> test_powf
-> test_exp
-> test_exp2
-> test_ln
-> test_log_generic
-> test_log2
-> test_log10
-> test_asinh
-> test_acosh
-> test_atanh
-> test_gamma
-> test_ln_gamma
Closes: #141726
r? tgross35