Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency svix to v1.89.0#892

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intocanaryfrom
renovate/svix-1.x
Open

fix(deps): update dependency svix to v1.89.0#892
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intocanaryfrom
renovate/svix-1.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 19, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
svix 1.88.01.89.0 age confidence

Release Notes

svix/svix-webhooks (svix)

v1.89.0

Compare Source

  • Server: Add a prune helper command to delete old data
  • Server: Invalidate CMA cache when creating/updating endpoints or apps
  • Server: Return empty JSON object from v1.message-attempt.resend
  • Server: Build Docker image with Rust 1.94
  • Bridge: Add support for PLAIN sasl auth for confluent cloud
  • Bridge: Build Docker image with Rust 1.94
  • Libs/Python: Set __str__ on errors

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2026 22:34
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from Cisneiros March 19, 2026 22:34
@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedsvix@​1.88.0 ⏵ 1.89.0991009897 +1100

View full report

Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 2 files

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants