loadscope: forget a dead worker's collection so a still-collecting worker isn't mistaken for done - #1364
Open
dchaudhari7177 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1362.
Problem
LoadScopeScheduling.remove_node()pops the dead worker fromassigned_workbut never removes its entry fromregistered_collections. Sincecollection_is_completedislen(registered_collections) >= numnodes, the stale entry keeps the collection looking "complete" while a later worker is still collecting.schedule()then runs and_assign_work_unit()raisesKeyErrorindexingregistered_collectionsfor the worker that never registered — crashing the run withINTERNALERROR. This affects both--dist=loadscopeand--dist=loadfile(the latter subclassesLoadScopeScheduling).Fix
Drop the node from
registered_collectionsinremove_node(), mirroring theassigned_work.pop(node)already there. A replacement worker then re-registers normally, andcollection_is_completedcorrectly waits for every live worker.This is safe for the shutdown path too: normal
worker_workerfinishedremovals only happen aftertriggershutdown, and on a crash the replacement worker re-registers its collection.Test
Added
TestLoadScopeScheduling::test_remove_node_forgets_dead_worker_collection, which reproduces the scenario withMockNodes (3 expected workers; one dies mid-collection while another is still collecting). It fails onmain(registered_collectionsstill holds the dead node,collection_is_completedflips true early) and passes with the fix. Fulltesting/test_dsession.pyis green;ruff check/formatclean. Addedchangelog/1362.bugfix.rst.