Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.1 to 10.0.0#126

Open
patinthehat wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-184c909c9a3ad28c437a672b6e017c3f
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.1 to 10.0.0#126
patinthehat wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-184c909c9a3ad28c437a672b6e017c3f

Conversation

@patinthehat
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-AJV-15274295
  157  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-AJV-15274295
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 14, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-184c909c9a3ad28c437a672b6e017c3f

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@what-the-diff
Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Feb 14, 2026

PR Summary

  • Update of ESlint Version
    The version of ESlint, a tool for identifying and reporting on patterns found in JavaScript code, has been upgraded from "^8.57.0" to "^10.0.0". This update could provide new features, enhancements, and bug fixes, leading to better code quality and stability.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ac9b06634c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

"dts-bundle-generator": "^9.3.1",
"esbuild": "^0.23.0",
"eslint": "^8.57.0",
"eslint": "^10.0.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep ESLint 8 until flat-config migration is complete

Upgrading eslint to ^10.0.0 will break the existing lint workflow because this repository still uses .eslintrc.js and has no eslint.config.* file. ESLint v9+ expects flat config by default, so scripts like lint, lint:fix, and lint-staged will fail before linting starts in environments that install this dependency update, blocking CI/hooks until the config is migrated or ESLint is pinned to v8.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants