Skip to content

Use libzim 9.5.1#187

Merged
benoit74 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
libzim-9.5.1
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

Use libzim 9.5.1#187
benoit74 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
libzim-9.5.1

Conversation

@kelson42
Copy link
Contributor

@kelson42 kelson42 commented Mar 21, 2026

We were using old version 9.4.0

@kelson42 kelson42 marked this pull request as draft March 21, 2026 04:45
@kelson42 kelson42 force-pushed the libzim-9.5.1 branch 2 times, most recently from e260016 to a23473e Compare March 21, 2026 08:01
@kelson42 kelson42 requested a review from benoit74 March 21, 2026 08:04
@kelson42 kelson42 added this to the 4.1.0 milestone Mar 21, 2026
@kelson42 kelson42 marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2026 08:05
Copy link
Contributor

@benoit74 benoit74 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, I've fixed changelog and I will merge

@benoit74 benoit74 merged commit 948c48a into main Mar 23, 2026
22 checks passed
@benoit74 benoit74 deleted the libzim-9.5.1 branch March 23, 2026 09:32
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (264affa) to head (c14d5c5).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #187   +/-   ##
===========================
===========================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants