Skip to content

Features/#835 simplified distribution grids#836

Merged
ClaraBuettner merged 80 commits intodevfrom
features/#835-simplified-distribution-grids
Mar 24, 2026
Merged

Features/#835 simplified distribution grids#836
ClaraBuettner merged 80 commits intodevfrom
features/#835-simplified-distribution-grids

Conversation

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This branch adds the option to consider simplified distribution grids in eTraGo.
The parametrization of the simplified distribution grids has to be provided in a csv file.
I created it with several eDisGo-simulations. Later on, that part will be included in eGo.

@KathiEsterl: I know that we still have to clarify some things, and also when we want to merge. Anyhow, I thought it helps to already have this draft PR.

@ClaraBuettner ClaraBuettner marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2026 10:30
ClaraBuettner and others added 22 commits February 26, 2026 13:00
Should be only added, if distribution grids links are considered and extendable
Otherwise small numerical differences case problems in the spatial disaggregation
…erred to generators

This is needed for extendable links (H2_to_power) which otherwise can't be disaggregated correctly.
@KathiEsterl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have made a few minor updates to the documentation.

Additionally, I noticed that the docstrings in appl.py do not yet include the market_optimization and the new distribution_grid functionalities. Since you are more familiar with the respective parameters, could you please add them, @ClaraBuettner ?

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have made a few minor updates to the documentation.

Additionally, I noticed that the docstrings in appl.py do not yet include the market_optimization and the new distribution_grid functionalities. Since you are more familiar with the respective parameters, could you please add them, @ClaraBuettner ?

Yes, sure I will add a description there.

@KathiEsterl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I reviewed the code and verified its plausibility.
I ran several test cases using different settings and also evaluated the new plotting functions.
Additionally, I went through the updated documentation.
I just didn't conduct bigger calculations, but I guess we will do this anyhow soon.
Therefore, I guess the PR is ready to be merged :)

@ClaraBuettner ClaraBuettner merged commit 9a9e25f into dev Mar 24, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants