Skip to content

fix(ci): update Bedrock lockfile during releases - #509

Merged
apcha-oai merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
apcha/fix-bedrock-release-lockfile
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): update Bedrock lockfile during releases#509
apcha-oai merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
apcha/fix-bedrock-release-lockfile

Conversation

@apcha-oai

@apcha-oai apcha-oai commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Release PR #434 bumps the SDK to 0.81.0, but leaves the Bedrock bundle's local openai gem at 0.80.0. Its Bedrock CI job fails during Ruby setup because Bundler refuses to change path-gem versions in frozen mode.

Register gemfiles/bedrock.gemfile.lock in Release Please's extra-files and mark only the local SDK version for replacement. The pinned Ruby strategy already updates the root lockfile; extra files use the generic, annotation-based updater. No runtime code or dependency versions change in this PR.

The contribution guide and agent instructions note that the markers must be preserved after a Bundler lockfile rewrite. Two small tests in test/scripts/release_workflow_test.rb enforce the effective extra-files entry, marker placement around only the SDK version, and stable-version replacement without dependency changes. The existing rake test discovery runs them in the regular Ruby CI jobs; no new dependencies or workflow steps are needed. After this merges into main, the next Release Please run can refresh #434 with the matching Bedrock version. This PR does not publish a release.

@apcha-oai
apcha-oai requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2026 13:49
@apcha-oai
apcha-oai requested a review from a team August 21, 2026 13:49
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-21T13:58:58.231895Z b0d5eae New commits
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-08-21T13:59:31.774250Z b0d5eae New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@openai-sdks

openai-sdks Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OkTest Summary

237/237 SDK tests passed in 11.504s for Ruby SDK PR #509.

Test results — 42 files
Test Result Time
tests/chat-completions-complex-body.test.ts ✅ Passed 333ms
tests/chat-completions-create.test.ts ✅ Passed 358ms
tests/chat-completions-stream.test.ts ✅ Passed 173ms
tests/files-content-binary.test.ts ✅ Passed 304ms
tests/files-create-multipart.test.ts ✅ Passed 316ms
tests/files-list-pagination.test.ts ✅ Passed 180ms
tests/initialize-config.test.ts ✅ Passed 211ms
tests/instance-isolation.test.ts ✅ Passed 265ms
tests/models-list.test.ts ✅ Passed 263ms
tests/responses-background-lifecycle.test.ts ✅ Passed 264ms
tests/responses-body-method-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 533ms
tests/responses-cancel-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 273ms
tests/responses-cancel.test.ts ✅ Passed 323ms
tests/responses-compact-retries.test.ts ✅ Passed 389ms
tests/responses-compact.test.ts ✅ Passed 390ms
tests/responses-create-advanced-stream.test.ts ✅ Passed 173ms
tests/responses-create-advanced.test.ts ✅ Passed 219ms
tests/responses-create-disconnect.test.ts ✅ Passed 1.126s
tests/responses-create-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 268ms
tests/responses-create-malformed-api-responses.test.ts ✅ Passed 225ms
tests/responses-create-retries.test.ts ✅ Passed 500ms
tests/responses-create-stream-failures.test.ts ✅ Passed 218ms
tests/responses-create-stream-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 226ms
tests/responses-create-stream-wire.test.ts ✅ Passed 2.323s
tests/responses-create-stream.test.ts ✅ Passed 246ms
tests/responses-create-terminal-states.test.ts ✅ Passed 369ms
tests/responses-create-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 252ms
tests/responses-create.test.ts ✅ Passed 413ms
tests/responses-delete.test.ts ✅ Passed 347ms
tests/responses-input-items-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 191ms
tests/responses-input-items-list.test.ts ✅ Passed 213ms
tests/responses-input-items-options.test.ts ✅ Passed 261ms
tests/responses-input-tokens-count-timeout.test.ts ✅ Passed 286ms
tests/responses-input-tokens-count.test.ts ✅ Passed 390ms
tests/responses-malformed-inputs.test.ts ✅ Passed 2.01s
tests/responses-not-found-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 438ms
tests/responses-parse.test.ts ✅ Passed 304ms
tests/responses-retrieve-retries.test.ts ✅ Passed 353ms
tests/responses-retrieve.test.ts ✅ Passed 303ms
tests/responses-stored-method-errors.test.ts ✅ Passed 917ms
tests/retry-behavior.test.ts ✅ Passed 3.204s
tests/sdk-error-shape.test.ts ✅ Passed 490ms

View OkTest run #32489609491

SDK merge (8abd0a7a854c) · head (b0d5eae335d6) · base (d873fcf64534) · OkTest (2b1bdfd25e98)

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Castiron custom code

✅ No new custom-code files detected.

48 mixed files remain; 0 existing customizations changed.

Compared d873fcf64534b0d5eae335d6. Generated baselines verified.

48 existing customizations unchanged
  • lib/openai.rb
  • lib/openai/client.rb
  • lib/openai/models/chat/chat_completion_message.rb
  • lib/openai/models/chat/chat_completion_message_function_tool_call.rb
  • lib/openai/models/chat/completion_create_params.rb
  • lib/openai/models/response_format_json_schema.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/function_tool.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response_create_params.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response_format_text_config.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response_format_text_json_schema_config.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response_function_tool_call.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response_function_web_search.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/response_output_text.rb
  • lib/openai/models/responses/tool.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/beta/responses.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/beta/threads.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/chat/completions.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/files.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/responses.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/vector_stores/file_batches.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/vector_stores/files.rb
  • lib/openai/resources/webhooks.rb
  • rbi/openai/client.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/chat/chat_completion_message.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/chat/chat_completion_message_function_tool_call.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/chat/completion_create_params.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/response_format_json_schema.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/responses/response.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/responses/response_create_params.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/responses/response_function_tool_call.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/responses/response_function_web_search.rbi
  • rbi/openai/models/responses/response_output_text.rbi
  • rbi/openai/resources/chat/completions.rbi
  • rbi/openai/resources/files.rbi
  • rbi/openai/resources/responses.rbi
  • rbi/openai/resources/vector_stores/file_batches.rbi
  • rbi/openai/resources/vector_stores/files.rbi
  • scripts/castiron/README.md
  • scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py

8 more in the full report.

A changed generated baseline means this report cannot reliably identify which handwritten lines changed.

Inspect the custom-code diff

Download the exact patch produced by this run (requires repository access):

gh run download 32489607935 --repo openai/openai-ruby \
  --name castiron-custom-code-32489607935-1 --dir /tmp/castiron-custom-code-32489607935-1
git apply --stat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-32489607935-1/custom-code.patch
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-32489607935-1/custom-code.patch

Or reproduce it from an SDK checkout containing the vendored reporter:

git fetch --no-tags origin d873fcf645347ab771b5f92ec8598fb3f83a0c7f b0d5eae335d6af9de5a8932953406dc3ed025274
python3 scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py report \
  --base d873fcf645347ab771b5f92ec8598fb3f83a0c7f \
  --head b0d5eae335d6af9de5a8932953406dc3ed025274 --fetch --require-head-hash --public \
  --out /tmp/castiron-custom-code-b0d5eae335d6
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-b0d5eae335d6/custom-code.patch

This is the current full custom patch for mixed files, not an attribution of only the handwritten lines changed by this PR.

Full report and patch

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: edd079a33d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md

@jbeckwith-oai jbeckwith-oai left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the Bedrock frozen-lockfile release fix and the focused release regressions. Effective Release Please configuration, exact updater-marker placement, current SDK-version consistency, and isolated version replacement are all protected against marker/configuration regressions. Ruby/Bedrock, packaging, lint, compatibility, Castiron, and security checks look good.

@apcha-oai
apcha-oai added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 21, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit ccabba8 Aug 21, 2026
16 checks passed
@apcha-oai
apcha-oai deleted the apcha/fix-bedrock-release-lockfile branch August 21, 2026 14:10
@openai-sdks openai-sdks Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants