Skip to content

WEB-340 replace custom api of saving.service.ts#2713

Closed
JaySoni1 wants to merge 2 commits intoopenMF:openapi-integrationfrom
JaySoni1:WEB-340-replace-custom-api-of-saving-service-ts
Closed

WEB-340 replace custom api of saving.service.ts#2713
JaySoni1 wants to merge 2 commits intoopenMF:openapi-integrationfrom
JaySoni1:WEB-340-replace-custom-api-of-saving-service-ts

Conversation

@JaySoni1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replaced custom methods in *.ts files that were previously using SavingService with their corresponding auto-generated methods from the OpenAPI-based @fineract/client package.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
  • dev

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Note

.coderabbit.yaml has unrecognized properties

CodeRabbit is using all valid settings from your configuration. Unrecognized properties (listed below) have been ignored and may indicate typos or deprecated fields that can be removed.

⚠️ Parsing warnings (1)
Validation error: Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'pre_merge_checks'
⚙️ Configuration instructions
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • You can also validate your configuration using the online YAML validator.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@JaySoni1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gkbishnoi07 Please Review

@gkbishnoi07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Okay

@steinwinde
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gkbishnoi07 , I assume that your comment means that you are still reviewing this? I don't want to appear pushy - just want to make sure I understand your comment.

@gkbishnoi07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

image

cannot create saving account getting error

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please test your PR first

@JaySoni1 JaySoni1 force-pushed the WEB-340-replace-custom-api-of-saving-service-ts branch from 402472b to f087bcc Compare November 3, 2025 22:53
@JaySoni1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

JaySoni1 commented Nov 3, 2025

@gkbishnoi07 I have update the PR please review .

@JaySoni1 JaySoni1 requested a review from gkbishnoi07 November 4, 2025 00:10
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image

please test it properly

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request seems to be stale. Are you still planning to work on it? We will automatically close it in 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale label Dec 12, 2025
@JaySoni1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gkbishnoi07 I have a few doubts regarding this PR, so I have messaged you on Slack. Please check

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the Stale label Dec 18, 2025
@JaySoni1 JaySoni1 requested a review from gkbishnoi07 December 18, 2025 19:37
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request seems to be stale. Are you still planning to work on it? We will automatically close it in 30 days.

@Saifulhuq01
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @JaySoni1 and @gkbishnoi07,

I encountered the same blocker regarding the charges payload (API failure on account creation). I identified that the charges array was sending raw Date objects instead of the required string format, which caused the API 400 error.

I have submitted a fix in PR #3055 that resolves this by applying dateUtils.formatDate to the dueDate and feeOnMonthDay fields.

Verified locally: Savings Accounts with charges can now be created successfully.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the Stale label Jan 29, 2026
@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 removed their request for review January 29, 2026 15:58
@gkbishnoi07 gkbishnoi07 self-requested a review February 12, 2026 19:30
@gkbishnoi07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

i moved your PR here link to solve some issues, thanks for the PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants