Update README.md to correct link name from Nativewind to Uniwind#527
Open
hooneun wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Update README.md to correct link name from Nativewind to Uniwind#527hooneun wants to merge 2 commits into
hooneun wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for obytes-starter canceled.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this do?
This PR updates the
README.mdfile to correct the styling library mentioned in the "Libraries used" section. Specifically, it changes "Nativewind" to "Uniwind" on line 95.Why did you do this?
Upon reviewing the
package.json, the project usesuniwind(^1.2.4) as a dependency alongside Tailwind CSS v4, andnativewindis not actually installed. This change ensures the documentation accurately reflects the current tech stack, preventing any confusion for developers adopting this template.Who/what does this impact?
This change only impacts the documentation (
README.md). It improves clarity for new users and contributors reading about the template's features. There are no downstream code or functional side effects.How did you test this?
I cross-referenced the
dependencieslist inpackage.jsonwith the "Libraries used" section in theREADME.mdto confirm the discrepancy, and verified the Markdown formatting of the updated line.