Refactor code for compliance with new eslint version

[Chartman123]

Signed-off-by: Christian Hartmann chris-hartmann@gmx.de

[susnux]

I think we now have two options:

• keep prettier and add it to the eslint config
• remove prettier and solely rely on the eslint formatting

[Chartman123]

I think we now have two options:

* keep prettier and add it to the eslint config

* remove prettier and solely rely on the eslint formatting

I'd say let's keep prettier? Or does this have any bigger downsides?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 44.18%. Comparing base (db02854) to head (eb0e27d).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2957   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     44.18%   44.18%           
  Complexity     1031     1031           
=========================================
  Files            80       80           
  Lines          3705     3705           
=========================================
  Hits           1637     1637           
  Misses         2068     2068           

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[susnux]

why removing prettier ci?
In case we do not enforce this on CI, we could also just completely remove prettier and just use eslint for formatting.

[Chartman123]

why removing prettier ci? In case we do not enforce this on CI, we could also just completely remove prettier and just use eslint for formatting.

Because it's already monitored in ESLint... If you have code, that doesn't comply to prettier rules, eslint will fail. So we don't need it twice

[susnux]

Because it's already monitored in ESLint... If you have code, that doesn't comply to prettier rules, eslint will fail. So we don't need it twice

Ah ok makes sense :)