[WIP - V5] Binding through select without having to provide items#4458
Closed
Tyme-Bleyaert wants to merge 2 commits intomicrosoft:dev-v5from
Closed
[WIP - V5] Binding through select without having to provide items#4458Tyme-Bleyaert wants to merge 2 commits intomicrosoft:dev-v5from
Tyme-Bleyaert wants to merge 2 commits intomicrosoft:dev-v5from
Conversation
… complexity based on Denis Pr
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
📖 Description
This pr is just an example of how we can bind and update the
ValueofFluentSelectfrom the selected option.This way we don't need two separate components to do a single thing.
👩💻 Reviewer Notes
@dvoituron & @MarvinKlein1508 Can you guys check if this aligns with what you were discussing on Whatsapp?
If i understood correctly the main issue was that we were unable to bind the
Valuewhen there were no items provided or theTOptiontype was not the same type as the actual value.This pr is for experimenting purposes and still needs work.
⏭ Next Steps