-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
Add opt-in Key Vault RBAC authorization for CAF/landing zone compliance #2249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Michael Flanakin (flanakin)
wants to merge
1
commit into
flanakin/v15-prep
Choose a base branch
from
flanakin/1067-keyvault-rbac
base: flanakin/v15-prep
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ param enableInfrastructureEncryption bool = false | |
| ]) | ||
| param keyVaultSku string = 'premium' | ||
|
|
||
| @description('Optional. Enable purge protection for the Key Vault. Default: false.') | ||
| @description('Optional. Enable purge protection for the Key Vault. Once enabled on a vault, purge protection cannot be disabled. Default: false.') | ||
| param enablePurgeProtection bool = false | ||
|
|
||
| @description('Optional. Enable Azure RBAC for authorizing access to the Key Vault instead of access policies. Required by some organizations for policy compliance (e.g., Cloud Adoption Framework guardrails). Switching an existing vault from access policies to RBAC has migration implications, so this defaults to false for backward compatibility with existing deployments; review before enabling on an upgrade. Default: false.') | ||
| param enableRbacAuthorization bool = false | ||
|
|
||
| @description('Optional. Remote storage account for ingestion dataset.') | ||
| param remoteHubStorageUri string = '' | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -195,6 +198,7 @@ var hub = newHub( | |
| storageSku, | ||
| keyVaultSku, | ||
| enablePurgeProtection, | ||
| enableRbacAuthorization, | ||
|
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this name too generic? This isn't clear it's for Key Vault only. |
||
| enableInfrastructureEncryption, | ||
| enablePublicAccess, | ||
| enableNatGateway, | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happens on existing deployments? Will it end up with both, rbac and access policies, as we are not removing access policies via bicep I guess.