Skip to content

Perf: bound Azure Blob payload operation concurrency for fan-out messages - #786

Open
berndverst wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
berndverst-miniature-chainsaw
Open

Perf: bound Azure Blob payload operation concurrency for fan-out messages#786
berndverst wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
berndverst-miniature-chainsaw

Conversation

@berndverst

@berndverst berndverst commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes #775 ## Summary AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor previously externalized and resolved independent Azure Blob payloads sequentially, adding per-field latency for fan-out responses, history chunks, query results, and entity batches. This PR adds an internal bounded-concurrency helper that overlaps up to eight storage operations per message. It avoids both serial latency and the throttling risk of unbounded Task.WhenAll fan-out. ## Correctness and failure semantics - Each pending operation makes an atomic dispatch claim under the same lock used to record failures. Once a failure is recorded, no unclaimed operation can begin; already-claimed operations drain before return. - If multiple claimed operations fail, the lowest input ordinal is rethrown with its original stack, preserving the prior sequential message-order failure behavior regardless of completion order. - Cancellation stops pending dispatch but never abandons started work. Cancellation is surfaced only when it actually prevented an operation from being dispatched; cancellation observed after all successful work was claimed does not retroactively convert success into cancellation. - The semaphore is disposed only after every claimed operation, including its release path, has completed. - Permanent storage failures retain the existing activity/orchestration conversion to TaskFailureDetails or a failed completion action. ## Protobuf safety Azure Blob I/O remains concurrent, but writes to multiple fields of the same Google.Protobuf message are serialized after each storage operation completes: - OrchestrationState input, output, and custom status; - CompleteOrchestrationAction result and details. Operations that mutate distinct protobuf messages remain concurrent. Collection ordering is unchanged because closures assign to their captured field or element rather than completion order. ## Compatibility No public API, serialization, wire-format, or replay behavior change. All helper and observability seams are private implementation details and are inert when unused. ## Testing The 17 focused interceptor tests cover bounded overlap, ordering, all refactored request/response shapes, permanent failures, pre-cancellation, failure ordering, failure-versus-dispatch races, cancellation-versus-drain behavior, late cancellation after completed success, shared-message monitor ownership, and throwing pre-claim callback cleanup. Concurrency regressions use deterministic gates rather than timing assumptions. The dispatch-claim and protobuf-lock tests were red-tested against the actual pre-fix implementations. Each regression was stress-run at least 10 times; after CI exposed thread-pool starvation in the monitor test harness, its dedicated-thread form passed 20 consecutive runs. ## Validation - Focused interceptor tests: 17/17 passing. - Concurrency stress runs: 60/60 passing on the final test implementations. - Full Grpc.IntegrationTests: 159/159 passing. - AzureBlobPayloads.csproj builds for netstandard2.0, net6.0, net8.0, and net10.0. - Independent GPT-5.6 Sol max-effort adversarial review: clean.

AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor previously awaited each Azure Blob
payload externalization/resolution sequentially per field, which adds
serial latency proportional to the number of independent payloads in a
message (e.g. fan-out orchestrator actions, history chunks, entity
batches). This change groups independent operations per message and
runs them with a bounded concurrency of 8 simultaneous requests via a
new RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync helper, instead of an unbounded
Task.WhenAll, to avoid tripping Azure Storage account-level throttling.

- Preserves protobuf field assignment correctness and collection
  ordering (each operation closure captures and assigns to its own
  distinct field/element).
- Preserves cancellation: checked before starting any not-yet-started
  operation.
- Preserves first-failure semantics: once an operation fails, no new
  operations are started, and the first exception propagates via
  Task.WhenAll, matching prior sequential-await behavior relied upon
  by callers (e.g. conversion to TaskFailureDetails).
- No public API changes; all changes are internal to the sealed
  interceptor class.

Adds focused unit tests covering resolve/externalize ordering,
concurrency bound, cancellation, and permanent-failure conversion.

Fixes #775

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 8171f40b-65d8-4cd5-b14c-59895e8ee8e8
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 24, 2026 22:12

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR improves Azure Blob large-payload handling performance in the gRPC sidecar interceptor by replacing per-field sequential awaits with a bounded-concurrency execution model, reducing additive latency in fan-out messages while avoiding unbounded parallelism that could trigger Azure Storage throttling.

Changes:

  • Introduced a bounded-concurrency helper (RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync) capped at 8 concurrent payload operations per message.
  • Refactored response resolution and request externalization paths to batch independent payload operations and execute them through the helper.
  • Added focused tests validating ordering, bounded concurrency, cancellation behavior, and permanent-failure conversion behavior.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs Refactors payload resolve/externalize logic to run independent store ops with bounded concurrency via a new helper.
test/Grpc.IntegrationTests/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptorTests.cs Adds tests for ordering correctness, concurrency bounds, cancellation, and permanent-failure handling for the refactored interceptor behavior.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:504

  • After awaiting throttle.WaitAsync, the loop doesn't re-check firstFailure before starting the next operation. If another in-flight operation fails while this iteration is blocked in WaitAsync, this iteration can still enqueue a new operation (violating the intended “stop starting new operations after first failure” behavior). Also, if multiple operations fault, relying on Task.WhenAll to pick which exception to throw can drift from the intended first-failure semantics.
            await throttle.WaitAsync(cancellation);
            inFlight.Add(TrackAsync(operation));

Two related bugs in RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync found during
independent review of PR #786:

1. Semaphore disposal race: the bounding SemaphoreSlim was wrapped in
   using, so a ThrowIfCancellationRequested or WaitAsync(cancellation)
   throw during the dispatch loop would unwind and dispose it while
   already-dispatched TrackAsync tasks were still running and would
   later call Release() in their finally block. This could produce an
   unobserved ObjectDisposedException, mask a genuine (non-cancellation)
   PayloadStorageException from an in-flight operation, and risked a
   protobuf field mutation after the caller had already received a
   response/exception.

   Fix: the semaphore is no longer disposed via using. Every dispatched
   operation is now always drained via
   try { await Task.WhenAll(inFlight); } finally { throttle.Dispose(); }
   before the method returns or throws, and TrackAsync no longer
   rethrows -- it only records the first exception via
   Interlocked.CompareExchange, so Task.WhenAll can never fault and
   disposal is only ever reached once every Release() has already run.
   The captured first failure is re-thrown afterwards via
   ExceptionDispatchInfo to preserve its original stack trace and
   first-failure semantics.

2. Post-WaitAsync cancellation gap: the dispatch loop only checked
   cancellation/failure before calling throttle.WaitAsync(), not after.
   A slot freed by an in-flight operation could let a new (9th, 10th,
   ...) operation dispatch even though cancellation/failure had already
   been observed while waiting for that slot.

   Fix: added a second check immediately after WaitAsync() succeeds;
   if cancellation or a failure is now observed, the just-acquired slot
   is released back and the loop stops without starting that operation.
   WaitAsync is now called with CancellationToken.None (not the
   caller's token), since every dispatched operation already observes
   the same token itself -- avoiding a WaitAsync-triggered unwind that
   would abandon an already-tracked operation.

Added a regression test
(RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync_CancelledWhileOperationsInFlight_DrainsBeforeReturningAndDoesNotMaskFailure)
that dispatches 9 operations (one over the concurrency limit of 8),
cancels after the first 8 are genuinely in-flight, and verifies the
call surfaces the genuine InvalidOperationException from an in-flight
operation (not OperationCanceledException or ObjectDisposedException),
that the 9th operation is never dispatched, and that draining completes
within a bounded timeout (guards against a deadlock regression).

Also addressed CA2016 (explicit CancellationToken.None) and CA1859
(List<Func<Task>> instead of IReadOnlyList<Func<Task>> parameter, since
all call sites already pass a concrete List) surfaced while touching
this method.

All 11 tests in AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptorTests pass, and the
full Grpc.IntegrationTests suite (153 tests) passes.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 8171f40b-65d8-4cd5-b14c-59895e8ee8e8
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 24, 2026 22:54

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync previously recorded whichever concurrent
operation faulted first. This could change the existing sequential
message-order contract: a later permanent PayloadStorageException could
mask an earlier retriable Blob failure and incorrectly convert an
OrchestratorResponse to a terminal failure.

Track each fault with its operation ordinal, drain all started work, and
then propagate the lowest-ordinal failure. A genuine in-flight failure
continues to take precedence over concurrent cancellation, matching
sequential await behavior.

Add deterministic caller-level coverage where the first payload upload
blocks and then raises a retriable RequestFailedException while a later
payload fails permanently first. The test verifies the retriable failure
escapes and no terminal response conversion occurs. Rename the existing
cancellation regression to state its real-failure precedence policy.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 8171f40b-65d8-4cd5-b14c-59895e8ee8e8
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 24, 2026 23:22

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (10)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:150

  • These queued operations use expression-bodied async lambdas that return Task<string?> (assignment expression), which is incompatible with List<Func> and will fail to compile. Wrap the assignment in a statement-bodied async lambda.
                        operations.Add(async () => s.Input = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Input, cancellation));
                        operations.Add(async () => s.Output = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Output, cancellation));
                        operations.Add(async () => s.CustomStatus = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.CustomStatus, cancellation));

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:165

  • This operation is an expression-bodied async lambda that returns Task<string?> due to the assignment expression, which won’t compile when added to List<Func>. Use a statement-bodied async lambda.
                        operations.Add(async () => em.SerializedState = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(em.SerializedState, cancellation));

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:179

  • This queued operation is an expression-bodied async lambda that returns Task<string?> (assignment expression), which won’t compile when targeting Func. Wrap the assignment in braces so the lambda returns Task.
                        operations.Add(async () => ar.Input = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(ar.Input, cancellation));

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:203

  • The queued operations that assign EntityState and OperationRequest.Input are expression-bodied async lambdas, so they return Task<string?> and won’t compile when stored as Func. Use statement-bodied async lambdas for these assignments.
                        operations.Add(async () => er1.EntityState = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(er1.EntityState, cancellation));
                        if (er1.Operations != null)
                        {
                            foreach (P.OperationRequest op in er1.Operations)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:212

  • This queued operation is an expression-bodied async lambda that returns Task<string?> (assignment expression), which is incompatible with Func. Wrap the assignment in a statement-bodied async lambda.
                        operations.Add(async () => er2.EntityState = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(er2.EntityState, cancellation));

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:235

  • The operations list is populated with expression-bodied async lambdas whose bodies are assignment expressions, so they return Task<string?> and won’t compile as Func. Convert these to statement-bodied async lambdas (wrap in { ...; }).
        List<Func<Task>> operations = [async () => r.CustomStatus = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(r.CustomStatus, cancellation)];

        foreach (P.OrchestratorAction a in r.Actions)
        {
            if (a.CompleteOrchestration is { } complete)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:260

  • These operations are also expression-bodied async lambdas returning Task<string?> due to assignment expressions, which won’t compile when stored as Func. Wrap each assignment in a statement-bodied async lambda.
            if (a.SendEvent is { } sendEvt)
            {
                operations.Add(async () => sendEvt.Data = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(sendEvt.Data, cancellation));
            }

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:284

  • These operations use expression-bodied async lambdas that return Task<string?> (assignment expression), which is incompatible with List<Func> and will not compile. Use statement-bodied async lambdas for these assignments.
        List<Func<Task>> operations = [async () => r.EntityState = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(r.EntityState, cancellation)];

        if (r.Results != null)
        {
            foreach (P.OperationResult result in r.Results)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:301

  • The queued operations for SendSignal/Input and StartNewOrchestration/Input are expression-bodied async lambdas returning Task<string?> (assignment expression), which won’t compile as Func. Wrap each assignment in a statement-bodied async lambda.
                if (action.SendSignal is { } sendSig)
                {
                    operations.Add(async () => sendSig.Input = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(sendSig.Input, cancellation));
                }

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:318

  • These operations use expression-bodied async lambdas (assignment expressions), which return Task<string?> and won’t compile when stored as Func. Wrap the assignments in statement-bodied async lambdas.
        List<Func<Task>> operations = [async () => r.EntityState = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(r.EntityState, cancellation)];

        if (r.Operations != null)
        {
            foreach (P.OperationRequest op in r.Operations)

RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync skipped cancellation handling when its
one-operation fast path directly invoked the payload delegate. A
pre-cancelled one-field OrchestratorResponse could therefore issue a
Blob upload or convert a permanent payload failure into a terminal
response instead of propagating cancellation.

Check the token before invoking the fast-path operation. Add caller-
level coverage for a pre-cancelled CustomStatus-only response that uses
a permanent upload failure as a sentinel, verifying cancellation
propagates, no upload starts, and no terminal conversion is applied.

Update the existing test store to count every upload attempt, including
controlled failing uploads used by cancellation coverage.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 8171f40b-65d8-4cd5-b14c-59895e8ee8e8
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 24, 2026 23:55

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:151

  • This builds 3 independent operations per OrchestrationState instance, so the bounded-concurrency runner may set Input/Output/CustomStatus on the same P.OrchestrationState concurrently. Protobuf messages aren't safe for concurrent mutation; a safer approach is to keep concurrency across instances but resolve each instance's fields sequentially within a single operation.
                    List<Func<Task>> operations = [];
                    foreach (P.OrchestrationState s in r.OrchestrationState)
                    {
                        operations.Add(async () => s.Input = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Input, cancellation));
                        operations.Add(async () => s.Output = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Output, cancellation));
                        operations.Add(async () => s.CustomStatus = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.CustomStatus, cancellation));
                    }

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:239

  • Within a single CompleteOrchestration action, Result and Details are externalized via two separate bounded-concurrency operations. That can concurrently mutate the same protobuf message (complete), which is not thread-safe for concurrent writes. Combine these into one operation so each message instance is only mutated by one task at a time.
            if (a.CompleteOrchestration is { } complete)
            {
                operations.Add(async () => complete.Result = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(complete.Result, cancellation));
                operations.Add(async () => complete.Details = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(complete.Details, cancellation));
            }

Bernd Verst and others added 2 commits July 27, 2026 11:31
Preserve concurrent Blob I/O while serializing assignments that mutate
multiple fields of the same Google.Protobuf message. Protect
OrchestrationState input/output/custom-status assignments in GetInstance
and QueryInstances responses, plus CompleteOrchestration result/details
externalization, with short message-level locks after the storage
operation completes.

Add a deterministic GetInstance regression that holds the shared
OrchestrationState monitor while three controlled downloads complete. It
verifies downloads overlap but the response cannot complete until the
shared-message lock is released. Extend the in-memory store double with
controlled download behavior and attempt counting.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 8171f40b-65d8-4cd5-b14c-59895e8ee8e8
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 27, 2026 18:43

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:519

  • The XML doc says assignments targeting the same protobuf message "are serialized", but RunWithBoundedConcurrencyAsync doesn't itself provide any synchronization; it just runs the delegates concurrently. The synchronization is currently implemented (selectively) by individual delegates via lock statements, so the doc should reflect that callers are responsible for synchronizing same-message mutations.
    /// (risking Azure Storage throttling for messages with many payloads). Each delegate is
    /// expected to assign its result to a distinct protobuf field/element, so the relative
    /// completion order between operations does not affect correctness. Blob I/O is concurrent,
    /// but assignments targeting fields on the same protobuf message are serialized because
    /// Google.Protobuf messages do not support concurrent mutation.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot-Session: 01dc5b7c-c742-45b7-ae8c-5cda9bcfbd2c
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 27, 2026 18:50

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (7)

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:129

  • These concurrent operations lock only for assignment, but they read s.Input outside the lock before awaiting. If another operation assigns a different field on the same protobuf message while this read occurs, it can create concurrent read/write access on a Google.Protobuf message (not thread-safe). Snapshot the field value under the same lock before starting the async resolve, then assign under the lock after the await.
                        async () =>
                        {
                            string? input = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Input, cancellation);
                            lock (s)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:137

  • Same issue as the Input resolver above: s.Output is read outside the lock before the await, which can race with other concurrent assignments to the same protobuf message. Snapshot under lock, then assign under lock.
                        async () =>
                        {
                            string? output = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Output, cancellation);
                            lock (s)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:145

  • Same pattern: s.CustomStatus is read outside the lock prior to the await. To avoid concurrent read/write access on the same protobuf message instance, snapshot the current value under lock before the async call.
                        async () =>
                        {
                            string? customStatus = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.CustomStatus, cancellation);
                            lock (s)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:173

  • Within QueryInstancesResponse, each OrchestrationState has 3 concurrent operations. This one reads s.Input outside the lock; if another operation assigns s.Output/s.CustomStatus concurrently, this can still be concurrent access on the same protobuf message. Snapshot the source value under lock before awaiting, then assign under lock.
                        operations.Add(async () =>
                        {
                            string? input = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Input, cancellation);
                            lock (s)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:181

  • Same issue for the Output resolver: snapshot s.Output under lock before awaiting to avoid concurrent read/write access on the same OrchestrationState protobuf message.
                        operations.Add(async () =>
                        {
                            string? output = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.Output, cancellation);
                            lock (s)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:189

  • Same issue for CustomStatus: snapshot s.CustomStatus under lock prior to awaiting to avoid concurrent access to the same protobuf message instance.
                        operations.Add(async () =>
                        {
                            string? customStatus = await this.MaybeResolveAsync(s.CustomStatus, cancellation);
                            lock (s)
                            {

src/Extensions/AzureBlobPayloads/Interceptors/AzureBlobPayloadsSideCarInterceptor.cs:291

  • Same as above for complete.Details: snapshot under lock before awaiting to avoid concurrent read/write access on the same protobuf message instance.
                operations.Add(async () =>
                {
                    string? details = await this.MaybeExternalizeAsync(complete.Details, cancellation);
                    lock (complete)
                    {

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 01dc5b7c-c742-45b7-ae8c-5cda9bcfbd2c
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 28, 2026 01:09

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 01dc5b7c-c742-45b7-ae8c-5cda9bcfbd2c
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 28, 2026 01:29

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 01dc5b7c-c742-45b7-ae8c-5cda9bcfbd2c
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 28, 2026 01:56

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 01dc5b7c-c742-45b7-ae8c-5cda9bcfbd2c
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 28, 2026 02:22

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Performance: avoid serial Azure Blob payload operations for fan-out messages

2 participants