[ruby] Update rubocop-rails 2.32.0 → 2.33.0 (minor)#400
Closed
depfu[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Closed
[ruby] Update rubocop-rails 2.32.0 → 2.33.0 (minor)#400depfu[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
depfu[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16871131501Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Contributor
Author
|
Closing because this update has already been applied |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ rubocop-rails (2.32.0 → 2.33.0) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
2.33.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 30 commits:
Cut 2.33.0Update ChangelogMerge pull request #1507 from koic/fix_false_negatives_for_rails_pluck[Doc] Tweak the doc of `Rails/FindByOrAssignmentMemoization`Remove useless `unless` node typeMerge pull request #1506 from koic/make_rails_enum_syntax_aware_of_lib[Fix #1505] Fix false negatives for `Rails/Pluck`Merge pull request #1324 from r7kamura/find-by-orMerge pull request #1503 from koic/fix_false_positives_for_rails_output[Fix #1474] Make `Rails/EnumSyntax` include the lib directory by defaultMerge pull request #1502 from koic/fix_false_positives_for_rails_transaction_exit_statement[Fix #1486] Fix false positives for `Rails/Output`[Fix #1495] Fix false positives for `Rails/TransactionExitStatement`[Fix #1463] Mark `Rails/IndexWith` as unsafe autocorrectMerge pull request #1501 from lovro-bikic/rails-order-argumentsAdd new cop Rails/OrderArgumentsMerge pull request #1500 from r7kamura/useless-method-def-excludeExclude controllers and mailers from `Lint/UselessMethodDefinition`Merge pull request #1499 from fatkodima/fix-false-negative-for-env_localFix a false negative for `Rails/EnvLocal` when having preceding conditionsMerge pull request #1497 from r7kamura/in-where-fixFix bugs in `Rails/PluckId` and `Rails/PluckInWhere`Suppress RuboCop's offensesSuppress RuboCop's offensesMerge pull request #1490 from viralpraxis/actualize-referencesActualize referencesSuppress RuboCop's warning and offenseMerge pull request #1483 from lovro-bikic/index-method-nested-autocorrectFix autocorrection error with nested index offensesSwitch back docs version to masterRelease Notes
2.11.1 (from changelog)
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:
Release v2.11.1Add ruby-head unicode propertiesRemove redundant selfFix an accessor for Ruby <= 2.5Fix compatibility with old RubiesRemove scheduled tests ...Simplify ragel taskDepfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands