Release/2.8.1#1118
Draft
hiroshihorie wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…1106) ## Summary - Align Flutter default local-video degradation behavior with the Swift SDK. - Default unset `VideoPublishOptions.degradationPreference` to `maintainResolution` for camera and screen-share publishing. - Keep explicit degradation preferences overrideable by apps. ## Context Related to #1097, which explores preserving video quality through a live-streaming option. This PR takes the smaller SDK-default approach instead: use maintain-resolution by default, matching Swift, without adding a separate app-facing toggle for this behavior. ## Testing - `dart analyze` - `flutter test test/core/room_e2e_test.dart`
## Summary Migrates the Android plugin to AGP 9's built-in Kotlin while keeping older toolchains building (same pattern as flutter-webrtc/flutter-webrtc#2075): - Apply the **Kotlin Gradle Plugin only when built-in Kotlin is inactive** — AGP < 9, or AGP 9 with `android.builtInKotlin=false` (the configuration Flutter currently ships by default while the ecosystem migrates). When AGP 9's built-in Kotlin is active it registers the `kotlin` extension itself and rejects KGP, so applying it is skipped. - Set the JVM target through the `kotlin { compilerOptions {} }` DSL **when the extension supports it** (KGP 1.9+ / AGP 9 built-in Kotlin), falling back to the legacy `kotlinOptions` DSL for apps still on KGP 1.8.x. - Bump the standalone buildscript fallback KGP to 2.1.0 so it is self-consistent. - Add a changeset entry for the generated release notes. ## Context AGP 9 uses built-in Kotlin support and rejects Android plugins that still apply KGP directly. This follows the Flutter compatibility migration path instead of raising the minimum supported toolchain. ## Verification - Example app builds (`flutter build apk --debug`) on the current stable toolchain (AGP 8.x + modern KGP path). - The AGP 9 built-in path mirrors the reviewed and merged flutter-webrtc implementation.
## Summary - Add `deployment` field to `RoomAgentDispatch` for targeting specific agent deployments - Add `agentDeployment` to `TokenRequestOptions` to pass deployment through token requests - Update generated JSON serialization code The `deployment` field allows targeting a specific agent deployment (e.g., "staging"). Leave empty to target the production deployment. Related PRs: - node-sdks: livekit/node-sdks#675 - python-sdks: livekit/python-sdks#722 - rust-sdks: livekit/rust-sdks#1176 - client-sdk-swift: livekit/client-sdk-swift#1043 - client-sdk-js: livekit/client-sdk-js#1971 ## Usage ```dart final options = TokenRequestOptions( roomName: 'my-room', agentName: 'my-agent', agentDeployment: 'staging', // Optional: target specific deployment ); ``` Or directly via `RoomAgentDispatch`: ```dart final dispatch = RoomAgentDispatch( agentName: 'my-agent', metadata: 'my-metadata', deployment: 'staging', ); ``` ## Test plan ### Unit Tests ```bash flutter test flutter test test/token/token_source_test.dart -v ``` ### Manual Verification **1. Verify JSON serialization includes deployment:** ```dart final dispatch = RoomAgentDispatch( agentName: 'my-agent', deployment: 'staging', ); final json = dispatch.toJson(); print(json); // Should include 'deployment': 'staging' ``` **2. Verify TokenRequestOptions converts to request correctly:** ```dart final options = TokenRequestOptions( roomName: 'test-room', agentName: 'my-agent', agentDeployment: 'staging', ); final request = options.toRequest(); print(request.roomConfiguration?.agents?.first?.deployment); // Should print 'staging' ``` **3. Verify JSON round-trip:** ```dart final original = RoomAgentDispatch( agentName: 'my-agent', deployment: 'staging', ); final json = original.toJson(); final restored = RoomAgentDispatch.fromJson(json); assert(restored.deployment == 'staging'); ``` ### End-to-End Verification 1. Use TokenSource to get credentials with agentDeployment set 2. Connect to room - agent with matching deployment should join 3. Verify only staging agent receives the dispatch 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.