Skip to content

Add term definitions for uppsok - #586

Open
niklasl wants to merge 10 commits into
developfrom
feature/uppsok-terms
Open

Add term definitions for uppsok#586
niklasl wants to merge 10 commits into
developfrom
feature/uppsok-terms

Conversation

@niklasl

@niklasl niklasl commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Define terms for concepts used in Uppsök; specifically:

  • Work categories
  • Classifications
  • new scheme

@niklasl niklasl changed the title Add initial term definitions for uppsok Add term definitions for uppsok Apr 27, 2026
@niklasl
niklasl marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2026 13:35

@kaipoykio kaipoykio left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ;)

@branchedelac branchedelac left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@niklasl
niklasl force-pushed the feature/uppsok-terms branch from e80ec2b to 97c93a6 Compare August 17, 2026 12:04

@kaipoykio kaipoykio left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to change the setname classification names to corresponding 'Set Spec' identifiers instead (https://uppsok.libris.kb.se/websearchhelp/help_uppsok/metadatamodell.htm#uppsa) ? It would remove one level of translation in the conversion code ;)

@niklasl

niklasl commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Makes sense to use those ("set spec") names for the local name parts! (IIRC we made just them up and missed those formal precursors.)

@niklasl

niklasl commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Revised in 8b97957 to use set spec names.

@kaipoykio kaipoykio left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants