Skip to content

[test] faster isDefEqApp#13979

Draft
datokrat wants to merge 1 commit into
leanprover:masterfrom
datokrat:paul/isDefEqApp
Draft

[test] faster isDefEqApp#13979
datokrat wants to merge 1 commit into
leanprover:masterfrom
datokrat:paul/isDefEqApp

Conversation

@datokrat

@datokrat datokrat commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@datokrat

datokrat commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!radar

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for 1332457 against a806b5c are in. There are significant results. @datokrat

Warning

These warnings may indicate that the benchmark results are not directly comparable, for example due to changes in the runner configuration or hardware.

  • Runner for run build has different system configurations between commits.
  • Runner for run other has different system configurations between commits.
  • build//instructions: -48.3G (-0.43%)

Large changes (1✅)

  • compiled/liasolver//instructions: -438.9M (-11.03%)

Medium changes (4✅)

  • elab/big_match//instructions: -72.3M (-0.70%)
  • elab/big_omega//instructions: -195.6M (-0.91%)
  • elab/big_omega_MT//instructions: -201.9M (-0.93%)
  • elab/bv_decide_large_aig//instructions: -794.5M (-2.00%)

Small changes (81✅, 2🟥)

Too many entries to display here. View the full report on radar instead.

@datokrat

datokrat commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

!radar

@leanprover-radar

leanprover-radar commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmark results for 41fbc98 against d2f48db are in. No significant results found. @datokrat

  • 🟥 build//instructions: +605.0M (+0.01%)

Small changes (1✅, 1🟥)

  • compiled/server_startup//instructions: -16.8M (-4.48%)
  • 🟥 elab/bv_decide_large_aig//task-clock: +120ms (+3.66%)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Jun 9, 2026
@leanprover-bot

leanprover-bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Reference manual CI status:

  • ❗ Reference manual CI can not be attempted yet, as the nightly-testing-2026-06-08 tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto nightly-with-manual, reference manual CI should run now. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2026-06-09 08:47:15)
  • ❗ Reference manual CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-manual branch. Try git rebase d2f48db30713019241520218d0965227bbb64eed --onto 803553a556fd82fa1060efb0c43eda542130cb16. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2026-06-09 09:24:27)

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the mathlib4-nightly-available A branch for this PR exists at leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing:lean-pr-testing-NNNN label Jun 9, 2026
@mathlib-lean-pr-testing

mathlib-lean-pr-testing Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase d2f48db30713019241520218d0965227bbb64eed --onto a806b5c9771998bcd75a5920da160b6d14a39346. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2026-06-09 09:24:25)
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-13979 has successfully built against this PR. (2026-06-09 09:42:05) View Log

@mathlib-lean-pr-testing mathlib-lean-pr-testing Bot added the builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR label Jun 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR mathlib4-nightly-available A branch for this PR exists at leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing:lean-pr-testing-NNNN toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants