docs: improve related docs links in pinning models page

[nafisa404]

Description

• Replaced raw URL with readable hyperlink text "Understanding Tool Modes"
• Added related documentation link for "Pin Model to Dock"
• Improved readability and consistency in the Related Docs section

Related Issue

Closes #1028

Notes

This change improves documentation UX by replacing raw URLs with descriptive links and adding an additional relevant resource.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the 'Pinning Models to Dock' documentation by refining the frontmatter formatting, improving text wrapping for better readability, and restructuring the 'Related Docs' section using Markdown list syntax. Feedback from the review suggests improving the document's structural hierarchy by using a level 2 heading for the 'Related Docs' section and ensuring that link text consistently matches the titles of the destination pages.

[github-actions]

Preview deployment for PR #1029 removed.

This PR preview was automatically pruned because we keep only the 6 most recently updated previews on GitHub Pages to stay within deployment size limits.

If needed, push a new commit to this PR to generate a fresh preview.

[Sbragul26]

LGTM ✅

[Bhumikagarggg]

@nafisa404 Thank you for your contribution! Let's discuss this during the website call tomorrow at 5:30 PM IST | 7 AM CST Add it as an agenda item to the meeting minutes, if you would 🙂

[KatalKavya96]

Hi @nafisa404,

Have all the requested changes/review comments been addressed now? If yes, could you please resolve/close the pending review conversations so that the PR can proceed ahead.

Thank you!

[nafisa404]

Hi @KatalKavya96 yes, all the requested review comments have been addressed. The Related Docs section is now rendered through a reusable Hugo partial instead of a hardcoded section, and the review conversations have been resolved.
Could you please take another look when you have a chance?
Thank you!

[KatalKavya96]

@nafisa404 Thanks for confirming.

Could you please push a small commit or re-trigger the preview deployment once, so I can verify the rendered page visually before moving ahead with the review?

[KatalKavya96]

@nafisa404 LGTM!

[nafisa404]

@CodexRaunak @leecalcote I think this is ready to be merged..

[leecalcote]

@banana-three-join, please consider this in context of the active work ensuing in the area of Related Reading.

[banana-three-join]

@nafisa404 Recently, a related-reading.html layout was added so all of the hardcoded and dynamic suggestions through the docs which don't use this new layout need to be removed. I'll go ahead and request an update to the PR and if you want, I can have you assigned still for the fix. I'll be helping you out as well if you have any questions so please let me know. Otherwise, I'll go ahead and close the PR so I can work on it.

[nafisa404]

@banana-three-join yes, I’d like to keep working on the fix if that’s okay.

I’ll update the PR to align with the newer related-reading.html approach and remove the outdated hardcoded/dynamic related docs handling accordingly. I may need a bit of guidance once I inspect how the new related-reading layout is expected to be wired in for this page, so I’ll reach out here if I get stuck.

Appreciate the help!

[banana-three-join]

@nafisa404 Okay, ty. You can also message me over in the slack channel if you have any questions.