Skip to content

Conversation

@tico88612
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind design

What this PR does / why we need it:

Remove netchecker (our self-test)

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related #12715

Special notes for your reviewer:

POC Hydrophone

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tico88612

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 28, 2025
@tico88612
Copy link
Member Author

/label tide/merge-method-merge

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tide/merge-method-merge Denotes a PR that should use a standard merge by tide when it merges. label Nov 28, 2025
@tico88612 tico88612 force-pushed the test/hydrophone branch 2 times, most recently from 3064720 to 2daf277 Compare November 29, 2025 04:06
@tico88612
Copy link
Member Author

/hold after 2.30 release cut.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 29, 2025
@tico88612
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-failed

@tico88612
Copy link
Member Author

Raising memory because conformance test.

https://gitlab.com/kargo-ci/kubernetes-sigs-kubespray/-/jobs/12262293572#L812

{
                        "type": "DisruptionTarget",
                        "observedGeneration": 1,
                        "status": "True",
                        "lastProbeTime": null,
                        "lastTransitionTime": "2025-11-29T07:23:55Z",
                        "reason": "TerminationByKubelet",
                        "message": "The node was low on resource: memory. Threshold quantity: 100Mi, available: 101276Ki. Container conformance-container was using 136628Ki, request is 0, has larger consumption of memory. Container output-container was using 364Ki, request is 0, has larger consumption of memory. "
},

@tico88612 tico88612 force-pushed the test/hydrophone branch 3 times, most recently from 92cd050 to b8f2ac0 Compare December 7, 2025 13:12
@VannTen
Copy link
Contributor

VannTen commented Dec 18, 2025

Btw, not sure if you had read the conversation on slack : https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C78F00H99/p1763150495755689

@tico88612
Copy link
Member Author

@VannTen I read that before.

I cherry-picked some tests here, if we just want to test whether the pods can connect to each other normally.

networking_check: "\\[sig-network\\] Networking Granular Checks.+\\[Conformance\\]"
  block:
  - name: Run the networking granular checks
    command: "{{ hydrophone_path }} --focus=\"{{ networking_check }}\" --parallel {{ hydrophone_parallel }}"

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/15673d04e30c711a7bb0f0efe6abf4baead1463b/test/conformance/testdata/conformance.yaml#L1822-L1873

@tico88612 tico88612 force-pushed the test/hydrophone branch 2 times, most recently from 2ca57f1 to 477d8b1 Compare January 10, 2026 17:40
@tico88612 tico88612 marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2026 17:40
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 10, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from VannTen January 10, 2026 17:40
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-merge Denotes a PR that should use a standard merge by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants