chore(RingTheory): adapt Perfectoid field draft to current master (revival) - #20
Open
sfingali wants to merge 7490 commits into
Open
chore(RingTheory): adapt Perfectoid field draft to current master (revival)#20sfingali wants to merge 7490 commits into
sfingali wants to merge 7490 commits into
Conversation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Revival of leanprover-community#26389 (as discussed — co-authoring).
What this does: adapts
Perfectoid.leanto the current master API so it compiles again:structure S extends P : Prop→structure S : Prop extends P(new syntax)UniformAddGroup→IsUniformAddGroup,TopologicalDivisionRing→IsTopologicalDivisionRing: Type extendsclasses𝒪[K]notation and theValuedfield names verified against current master (no changes needed)State: compiles against master, 13
sorrys remain — the mathematical work:valuedPerfectoidField.is_topological_valuationIsTopologicalNilpotent,val_p_lt_1Tiltfield instancePerfectoidField.isAlgClosed_iff_isAlgClosed_tiltProposal: I take the sorries in order (starting with
val_p_lt_1and the Frobenius-surjectivity API), you review. Happy to push directly to your branch instead if you prefer.