Conversation
|
Hi @jescalada! Thanks for your contribution to GitProxy. I noticed a couple of things that would help make this PR ready for review: Missing Description: Could you please add a description explaining what this change does and why it's needed? Even if this is a simulated feature, it would be helpful to understand the purpose. Missing Issue Link: According to our contributing guidelines, PRs should be linked to an issue. Please either:
This helps maintain our project's traceability and makes it easier for maintainers to understand the context. Thanks! |
🔒 Automated Security ReviewSecurity Review - No Issues FoundThis PR only contains a minor formatting change to the README.md file, adding backticks around a version number for better markdown formatting. No security concerns identified. |
|
Hi @jescalada! Thanks for your contribution to GitProxy. I notice a few things that would help us review this PR: Missing Description: Could you please add a description explaining what this change does and why it's needed? Even for simulated features, it helps reviewers understand the intent. Missing Issue Link: According to our contributing guidelines, PRs should link to an existing issue using keywords like "Fixes #N", "Closes #N", or "Resolves #N". If there isn't an existing issue for this change, please create one first, or if this relates to an existing issue, please link it in the description. Looking forward to your updates! |
|
Hi @jescalada! Thanks for your contribution. I notice this PR is missing a description. Could you please add a clear description explaining:
Additionally, please link this PR to a relevant issue using keywords like "Fixes #N", "Closes #N", or "Resolves #N". If no issue exists yet, please create one first to discuss the changes. This helps reviewers understand the context and ensures we're tracking the work properly. Thanks! |
|
Closing this PR as it doesn't have the updated CI workflows for some reason... |
1 participant
No description provided.