Skip to content

[PB-3528]:feat/update coverage for components#94

Merged
jaaaaavier merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
feat/update-test-coverage
Apr 1, 2026
Merged

[PB-3528]:feat/update coverage for components#94
jaaaaavier merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
feat/update-test-coverage

Conversation

@jaaaaavier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is part of a much larger PR aimed at improving coverage across all components that cause "issues" when running the yarn test command. I am organizing this into several smaller PRs to avoid creating one massive pull request.

@jaaaaavier jaaaaavier self-assigned this Mar 31, 2026
@jaaaaavier jaaaaavier added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 31, 2026
@jaaaaavier jaaaaavier requested a review from larryrider March 31, 2026 11:06
expect(avatarComponent).toMatchSnapshot();
});

it('Avatar with single word name should render correctly', () => {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey, the "it" tests are made to build the descriptions like "it should do whatever when whatever", for this other tests its more readable if you just use the "test" word, or if you just change it to this "it" descriptions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, I'll update this test now. I can also do a pass on the rest of the tests to apply this convention consistently. I'll reference task PB-3528 for that. What do you think??

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it looks good to me

@jaaaaavier jaaaaavier merged commit 7a86c7d into master Apr 1, 2026
1 check passed
@jaaaaavier jaaaaavier deleted the feat/update-test-coverage branch April 1, 2026 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants